QUOTE(RMHED @ Tue 19th April 2011, 5:23pm)
QUOTE(Silver seren @ Tue 19th April 2011, 10:07pm)
I don't think remembering who exactly oversighted the information is really necessary.
And I do understand why it was necessary within policy, I just think the policy is ignorant and wrong.
And if I have the timeline wrong, it's because no one really explained anything in any real detail. It took me forever to even get what I did out of you guys. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif)
Arbcom were of course acting in Rod's best interest, we know this to be true because they told us so.
And the rest is silence...
And that people who actually, you know, saw the statement agreed that it was oversighted for a good reason.
But that's just a minor flaw in your argument for a reason?
Talk about a catch 22. If we talk about the reason it was oversighted, then you'd blast us for treating RHE poorly by revealing real life issues. If we don't, we're hiding something from everyone.
And Silver: Do you have a reason to know this other then you can't stand not knowing the exact particulars of the issue? One would think that how things turned out (with RHE's appeal to Jimbo and Jimbo's modification), you'd be able to put 2 and 2 together and not get Pi.