QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Tue 31st May 2011, 12:14am)
Seems to me that defamation is an intentional tort, and as we all know, children as young as three have been held liable for intentional torts. Don't think that the "underagedness" of the defamer is an issue here, Master Seren. Perhaps you should edumacate yourself on the law before you open your furry little yap.
(Oh, wait, you think "education" is something you can get from Wikipoopia. Forget I said that.)
Children as young as three? Really? Who in their right mind would attempt to sue a three-year-old child through the civil courts?
This post has been edited by Malleus: