QUOTE(Mathsci @ Wed 1st June 2011, 8:32pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
Spencer195 has now been indefinitely blocked by Deskana, who gave these
reasons for blocking.
Seems to be a masterpiece of Wikilogic.
QUOTE
Secondly, you state that the policy on alternative accounts was different and asked what policy you violated. That is not an adequate defense. Policy is descriptive, not prescriptive; the fact that the policy has changed does not mean that community standards have. Thirdly, I was active around the time you left and I can assure you that this kind of behaviour was also unacceptable back then, regardless of what the policy stated.
Deskana concedes that no policy was violated but claims that Spencer's behaviour was nevertheless so unacceptable that a block was needed. Why? On what grounds?
QUOTE
Thidly (sic), you also stated that you don't see what you did wrong. This is the most disturbing thing, and the one (sic) of the main reasons I have blocked you.
Fancy that! He believed that since he acted 100% in accordance with policy he had done nothing wrong!! Block him immediately!!!