QUOTE
The Keats-Shelley Journal and those like it do appear on online databases. Most of those databases are used because of the small academic journals.
Does the Keats-Shelley journal appear on JSTOR? Do these on-demand journals? No? So you just picked some examples of really really really small journals that nobody reads and use that as a basis for your argument that there's no money in academic publishing. Seriously?
"I got a friend who lost money at a casino once. Obviously there's no money to be made in the world of finance. "
That's about the intellectual sophistication of your argument.
QUOTE
I think it is odd how you cling to Milton being correct when he is laughably wrong and contradicts himself. Then you attack me for not finishing my dissertation while acknowledging that I have a personal connection to the matter and you have no clue.
I didn't "attack" you for anything. Don't be such a god damn weasel. You're importing Wikipedia tactics ("I iz being attck!") onto WR. This isn't AN/I, full of gullible editors and admins who take such weird claims seriously.
And yes, you got better things to do than waste time on this discussion.
QUOTE
Somey, is it right that WR is being filled with the uninformed spouting whatever ignorance they can? Isn't that Wikipedia's major failing? I find it odd how those two are spouting off stuff that Gerard is spouting off. Can we just show them the door already?
Whine, whine, whine. Again, this isn't AN/I where you get to orchestrate blocks for people simply because they point out how clueless you are.
And no, "we" are not spouting what Gerard is. Quit freaking lying. You're just embarrassing yourself. And your weaselly insinuations that Milton IS Gerard are just so freaking stupid they don't deserve a comment.
QUOTE
I mean, look at this. Radek is either trolling or illiterate:
A person who hasn't finished their dissertation accusing a person who actually has finished one of illiteracy - geez Ottava... you can do better than that.
QUOTE
Then you have him outright lying:
"it is more than the CEO of Bank of America, Microsoft and a number of other big names make."
Because we all know that Bill Gates made 60 billion not running Microsoft, right? Or that the Bank of America individual being a brand new CEO was receiving all of his pay package there, right? Or that he didn't have to take a salary hit because BoA was involved in the bank bailout and there was a lot of negative press over CEO pay in the US. I mean, the nonsense behind it all is almost revolting.
Dude, I even provided a link which listed CEO salaries. And here's a clue for you: Bill Gates is NOT the current CEO of Microsoft. Steven Ballmer is, and his annual salary, perks and all is 1.4 million which happens to be less than 2 million.
Here's another clue, wealth is not income. Wealth is the
accumulated value of your assets. A salary is what you get in payment per some period of time. It's like comparing an ocean with a river that flows into it and saying "see, the ocean has more water in it!". Gates didn't make that 60 billion in a single year from his salary.
If you don't like the BoA example, take Office Depot. Or Whole Foods. Not that you have any idea of what happened with BoA either.
QUOTE
Really, because he has even progressed through graduate school? Not from what anyone knows. Standard free kulture trolling.
If thinking "they must disagree with me because they're stupid and lying about having finished graduate school, because it takes a very very very long time to finish graduate school, obviously, since even a super smart guy like me is taking forever to do it, no way anyone who disagrees with a super smart guy like me could have done it, yes, that's it they must be lying" allows you to sleep better at night, then go ahead and think it.