![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Jagärdu |
![]()
Post
#1
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 149 Joined: Member No.: 22,114 ![]() |
Who is Cbrick77 (aka "Chris") and why is this newbie so interested in creating workshop proposals at the arbitration case between Cirt and Jayen? It certainly has Jayen perplexed and I can't imagine anyone is convinced by the protestations that this is his first account. So who the hell is he? A returned former admin or Arb who left the project with his tails between his legs? Another manifestation of ChrisO -- which would be funny for a number of reasons. Imagine ChrisO thinking to himself that signing his name "Chris" is like hiding in plain sight and therefore a wonderful disguise. I know there are people here who want to play this guessing game so let's hear it.
|
![]() ![]() |
-DS- |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Ethernaut ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 164 Joined: Member No.: 39,458 ![]() |
Yes, it is. (updating as I go through the puppets.) OK so who wants to bet on how long it will take the nitwits to figure it out? I say Cbrick is still amending his proposals come tomorrow morning. That depends. Roughly how long will it take for Coren or some other Arb to see this thread, block Chris and then claim all the credit while denying that he saw it on WR? |
Mathsci |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 205 Joined: From: South of France Member No.: 11,217 ![]() |
Yes, it is. (updating as I go through the puppets.) OK so who wants to bet on how long it will take the nitwits to figure it out? I say Cbrick is still amending his proposals come tomorrow morning. That depends. Roughly how long will it take for Coren or some other Arb to see this thread, block Chris and then claim all the credit while denying that he saw it on WR? Risker ran a checkuser on Chester Markel on June 19. Would she not have picked up on any other socks at the time? |
tarantino |
![]()
Post
#4
|
the Dude abides ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,441 Joined: Member No.: 2,143 ![]() |
Risker ran a checkuser on Chester Markel on June 19. Would she not have picked up on any other socks at the time? If someone consistently uses different user agent strings and ISPs for each account, checkuser isn't going to find anything. Mantanmoreland used to use long distance dial up accounts to make it appear his alternate accounts were editing from a different metropolitan area. It only takes one slip up to get caught, though. This post has been edited by tarantino: |
-DS- |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Ethernaut ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 164 Joined: Member No.: 39,458 ![]() |
Risker ran a checkuser on Chester Markel on June 19. Would she not have picked up on any other socks at the time? If someone consistently uses different user agent strings and ISPs for each account, checkuser isn't going to find anything. I've found that different user agent strings alone are enough for a checkuser to deem a sock "unrelated". I once ran a sock on my home IP (the Wikipediots know the IP range), but CU deemed it unrelated to me because I used a different browser than usual. |
No one of consequence |
![]()
Post
#6
|
I want to stare at the seaside and do nothing at all ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 635 Joined: Member No.: 1,010 ![]() |
I've found that different user agent strings alone are enough for a checkuser to deem a sock "unrelated". I once ran a sock on my home IP (the Wikipediots know the IP range), but CU deemed it unrelated to me because I used a different browser than usual. Either your ISP assigns a dynamic IP that changes frequently, or the person who ran the check needs a refresher course in basic methods. |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |