|
Help
This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.
The Joe H. challenge to Goethean |
|
|
victim of censorship |
|
Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,166
Joined:
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640
|
=Hello pathetic and cowardly little man=AKA... Goethean (T-C-L-K-R-D)
As you know where I live, I know were you live as well, so I have committed to confined my augments with you to this cesspool and Wikpeidia Review so as not to have it spill out in the street and I hope you do the same. Make no mistake, I have ABSOLUTELY no respect for your beliefs and methods of intellectual thuggery, bullying... You're a little man, pathetic and cowardly - intellectual, spiritual, and morally corrupt...your shameful ways of gaming Wikirulez, and other equally low games, in order to foist your rotten and flawed point of view, is reflective of your ethics I have seen on wikipeidia for years now. What is sad is no one calls you to task, with out getting wacked by your admin friends. Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make you a challenge, assuming you are brave enough and so sure of your beliefs, to crawl out from this dark and dank hiding place and on to Wikireview (a venue where you can't call an admin with tools, where you have to stand toe to toe on the merit of your augments and defend your sorry self, to the charges I make there, that your new age beliefs are garbage, and Ramakrishna's is just power mad homo erotic addict and your a sorry little thuggish boor. Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a coward, then I await your presence at Wikipedia Review so you can tell me and the, world at large, why your so right and the world is so wrong. MAN UP or hid like the weak bully boy you are.??? Any rate I be waiting for you there. JoE Addendum: Looks like Goathed is crying to his little owl face turkey.. ... Tiptoety (T-C-L-K-R-D)
.... MAN UP GOETHEAN COME HERE AND SHOW WHY YOUR RIGHT!!This is how Goethean "Mans up" with the help of his lacky wikiadmin buddy Acroterion This post has been edited by victim of censorship:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies
Alison |
|
Skinny Cow!
Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,514
Joined:
From: Kalifornia
Member No.: 1,806
|
|
|
|
|
victim of censorship |
|
Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,166
Joined:
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640
|
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Sun 21st November 2010, 11:34pm) QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 21st November 2010, 11:22pm) Looks like Wiki is Goeathed's personal ashram... Goethean (T-C-L-K-R-D)
appears to be using Wikipedia for his personal ashram... see his user page, and contribution and article he wildly defends and then consider wikipolicy... QUOTE Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion "WP:SOAP" redirects here. For the Soap Operas WikiProject, see WP:SOAPS. Policy shortcuts: WP:NOTSOAPBOX WP:NOTADVOCATE WP:NOTOPINION WP:NOTSCANDAL WP:NOTADVERTISING WP:PROMOTION WP:SOAP WP:SOAPBOX WP:NOTGOSSIP
Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for:
1. Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, religious, or otherwise. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views.[1] 2. Opinion pieces. Although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes" (i.e. passionately advocate their pet point of view), Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced to put entries, especially for current events, in a reasonable perspective, and represent a neutral point of view. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete. However, Wikipedia's sister project Wikinews allows commentaries on its articles. 3. Scandal mongering, something "heard through the grapevine" or gossip. Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy. Articles should not be written purely to attack the reputation of another person. 4. Self-promotion. It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which is difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. 5. Advertising. All information about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. Article topics must be third-party verifiable, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so.
Non-disruptive statements of opinion on internal Wikipedia policies and guidelines may be made on user pages, as they are relevant to the current and future operation of the project.
|
|
|
|
victim of censorship |
|
Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,166
Joined:
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640
|
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Tue 23rd November 2010, 1:22am) QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Sun 21st November 2010, 11:34pm) QUOTE(Alison @ Sun 21st November 2010, 11:22pm) Looks like Wiki is Goeathed's personal ashram... Goethean (T-C-L-K-R-D)
appears to be using Wikipedia for his personal ashram... see his user page, and contribution and article he wildly defends and then consider wikipolicy... QUOTE Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion "WP:SOAP" redirects here. For the Soap Operas WikiProject, see WP:SOAPS. Policy shortcuts: WP:NOTSOAPBOX WP:NOTADVOCATE WP:NOTOPINION WP:NOTSCANDAL WP:NOTADVERTISING WP:PROMOTION WP:SOAP WP:SOAPBOX WP:NOTGOSSIP
Wikipedia is not a soapbox, a battleground, or a vehicle for propaganda, advertising and showcasing. This applies to articles, categories, templates, talk page discussions, and user pages. Therefore, content hosted in Wikipedia is not for:
1. Advocacy, propaganda, or recruitment of any kind: commercial, political, religious, or otherwise. Of course, an article can report objectively about such things, as long as an attempt is made to describe the topic from a neutral point of view. You might wish to start a blog or visit a forum if you want to convince people of the merits of your favorite views.[1] 2. Opinion pieces. Although some topics, particularly those concerning current affairs and politics, may stir passions and tempt people to "climb soapboxes" (i.e. passionately advocate their pet point of view), Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Articles must be balanced to put entries, especially for current events, in a reasonable perspective, and represent a neutral point of view. Furthermore, Wikipedia authors should strive to write articles that will not quickly become obsolete. However, Wikipedia's sister project Wikinews allows commentaries on its articles. 3. Scandal mongering, something "heard through the grapevine" or gossip. Articles and content about living people are required to meet an especially high standard, as they may otherwise be libellous or infringe the subjects' right to privacy. Articles should not be written purely to attack the reputation of another person. 4. Self-promotion. It can be tempting to write about yourself or projects in which you have a strong personal involvement. However, do remember that the standards for encyclopedic articles apply to such pages just like any other. This includes the requirement to maintain a neutral point of view, which is difficult when writing about yourself or about projects close to you. Creating overly abundant links and references to autobiographical sources is unacceptable. See Wikipedia:Autobiography, Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. 5. Advertising. All information about companies and products are written in an objective and unbiased style. Article topics must be third-party verifiable, so articles about very small "garage" or local companies are typically unacceptable. External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article. Wikipedia neither endorses organizations nor runs affiliate programs. See also Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for guidelines on corporate notability. Those promoting causes or events, or issuing public service announcements, even if noncommercial, should use a forum other than Wikipedia to do so.
Non-disruptive statements of opinion on internal Wikipedia policies and guidelines may be made on user pages, as they are relevant to the current and future operation of the project.
"Bumped and grind" or as the typical Wikipeidiot would say. Troll onward. PS... I have nominated "Mr Barnstar of the month" right here. I think this guy may be a sock of Baseball bugs. Note.. Gogo Dodo This post has been edited by victim of censorship:
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
victim of censorship The Joe H. challenge to Goethean Alison
Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make yo... Jon Awbrey [size=3]Reader Advisory : Plot Spoiler Ahead â€... EricBarbour [size=3]Reader Advisory : Plot Spoiler Ahead â€... victim of censorship
Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make y... Tarc
[b]=[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?titl... Somey Hmm. Apparently what happened this time was, AnonI... victim of censorship
Hmm. Apparently what happened this time was, Anon... A Horse With No Name
This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, an... Alison
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='256453' ... victim of censorship
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='256453'... Alison
[quote name='Alison' post='256456' date='Mon 18th... Milton Roe
[quote name='A Horse With No Name' post='256455' ... TungstenCarbide I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of ... Milton Roe
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='256453' ... TungstenCarbide
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='256453' ... CharlotteWebb I did confront vic about his use of this epithet o... Somey I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of ... Milton Roe
This doesn't answer the question at hand, tho... victim of censorship
I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of... Alison
Now I have a question for Alison?...Why is Goethe... victim of censorship
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='256477' ... Alison Ok, so I got the gratuitous insult, etc. I was exp... victim of censorship
Ok, so I got the gratuitous insult, etc. I was ex... Tarc
From what I can see, he's got some sort of ha... victim of censorship
[quote name='Alison' post='256488' date='Tue 19th... Tarc
[quote name='Alison' post='256488' date='Tue 19t... victim of censorship
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='256560' ... Tarc
Fifth, It's personal.
Actually, that's r... Zoloft
Fifth, It's personal.
Actually, that's ... victim of censorship
[quote name='Tarc' post='257137' date='Tue 26th O... Alison
All admins are enablers to the violence and corr... Milton Roe
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='257195' ... victim of censorship
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='257195' ... Alison
[quote name='Alison' post='257201' date='Tue 26th... victim of censorship
[quote name='Alison' post='257201' date='Tue 26t... Sxeptomaniac
[quote name='Alison' post='257211' date='Tue 26th... victim of censorship
[quote name='Alison' post='257211' date='Tue 26t... Somey Joe, I work and live in an area where [url=http://... Alison
Seriously, Alison, in the Midwest we just don... Somey Does that mean I somehow saved Joe from getting pu... victim of censorship
Joe, I work and live in an area where [url=http:/... Tarc
[quote name='Somey' post='257215' date='Tue 26th ... Alison
Seeing how you are an utter failure on both fron... victim of censorship
[quote name='Tarc' post='257664' date='Mon 1st No... victim of censorship
It's pretty clear that *both* of them are off... Tarc
Btw, on e Nov3, I fully expect this failed, Non-n... victim of censorship
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='257681' ... victim of censorship
[quote name='Somey' post='257215' date='Tue 26th... Cock-up-over-conspiracy ... and the fact that I'm trying to disconnect... A Horse With No Name
Now I have a question for Alison?...Why is Goethe... A Horse With No Name
Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a co... The Joy The only way to truly get rid of someone on Wikipe... victim of censorship
The only way to truly get rid of someone on Wikip... Somey How do you know I'm not in process.
Because yo... victim of censorship
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='256732' ... Sxeptomaniac
Real life is more important the the religion of w... Subtle Bee
Real life is more important the the religion of ... victim of censorship Looks like Goethean mans up all right
Cowards... Subtle Bee
Again show me, at Wikipedia review, why you are n... TungstenCarbide
Again show me, at Wikipedia review, why you are ... Milton Roe
[quote name='Subtle Bee' post='256789' date='Thu ... Somey Yeah, Somey, you have to do it for at least a week... CharlotteWebb
I thought we were supposed to be a "family... Milton Roe
[quote name='Milton Roe' post='256813' date='Thu ... Somey ...in the present, I push in efforts to educate th... victim of censorship
...in the present, I push in efforts to educate t... A Horse With No Name
230... sorry ...
You need to lose weight, Joe.... victim of censorship
[quote name='victim of censorship' post='256732' ... Sxeptomaniac
The only way to truly get rid of someone on Wikip... EricBarbour Nobody noticed this? victim of censorship
[b]=[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?titl... Zoloft Looks like Goethean is stalking and trying to hurt... victim of censorship
=[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=U... victim of censorship Just making sure this thread never dies, as Goethe...
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |