QUOTE(No one of consequence @ Mon 8th August 2011, 7:17pm)
On the other hand, if someone else wants to step forward and offer evidence, Arbcom should definitely open a case.
It is a pointless waste of time. The system is broke and arguing about individuals is plain stupid. because even if one beat up on WBB and SV it doesn't fix the other editors doing the same thing in other places.
You can look at this exchange that I had with them back last February when I
quizzed them about the process, and what I got was flannel. Now you can read the whole exchange just start search the page for 'lilburne' or you can
just skip to my summary of it.
But it really isn't about WBB, SV, Cirt, or any of the rest. It is the process that can proceed
year after year, and result in articles like that one, that is in need of fixing not just these editors.
Berlinski is another one where for years the owners of the article have known that he isn't really ID, for one he doesn't believe that God had anything to do with it. But
they fought tooth and claw to keep him as leader of the ID movement. Though to their credit they did give up on that one.
Its the process, policies, and the way the site operates that is the problem, the individual editors are just turning the handle of the sausage machine, and ArbCom doesn't appear to be the venue for fixing any of it.