http://www.dailydot.com/news/encyclopedia-dramatica-outage/Brandt, how do you feel about the latest Daily Dot article? The article says,
QUOTE
Brandt was unavailable for comment at time of publication.
http://www.dailydot.com/ethics-policy/:
QUOTE
The Daily Dot’s first and most important responsibility is accuracy. We make reasonable efforts to verify information by publication time and we disclose to readers transparently what we do and do not know to be a fact. Should we receive information that questions something we have published, we will not rest until we have established the veracity of that information and corrected the record.
Corrections will be made to the original story clearly and with explanation. In regard to material details being corrected well after publication, we will publicize the changes in a manner similar to the original publication of the story.
If you have anything to say or correct, you're welcome to let them know.
Before I revise the Wikipedia article, I wish to know whether there are any inaccurate statements about you in the article. Do you have anything to say about your alleged involvement?
Also, how do you feel about Kevin Provance's comment at the bottom?