QUOTE(Guido den Broeder @ Thu 6th October 2011, 8:53am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
QUOTE(SB_Johnny @ Thu 6th October 2011, 1:32am)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
QUOTE(It's the blimp, Frank @ Wed 5th October 2011, 1:36pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
Right here. I am impressed by his imperious style. Obviously everyone should bow down before him.
More power to him. The guy pretty much got banned for being a bit harsh on people who deserved it, from what I understand.
Really? When he was an administrator, the guy banned me from Wikipedia when I asked him not to editwar with another user over spelling. Others were treated in a similar fashion.
Fortunately for WMC, Wikipedia doesn't have a "Child of Privilege-big-ego, artificially affected misanthropic, jaded, high-falooting" activist rule, or he would have been sent on his way long ago.
Here's the thing, I truly don't belive that WMC, Stephan Schulz, Kim Dabelstein Peterson, or Short Brigade Harvester Boris are really scientists, because I can't belive that true scientists would act as deceitfully, dishonestly, or as insecurely and cowardly as they act. If they are really scientists, I would like to know which universities they teach at to ensure that I don't send my kids to those bush league institutions. To be clear, I respect scientists who truly believe in man-made global warming but recognize that they might be wrong. The ones who don't are the ones who try to use Wikipedia to artificially socialize their positions.