|
Moral bankruptcy?, The Butler in the library with the canlestick |
|
|
|
|
Replies
communicat |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 270
Joined:
From: Southern Africa
Member No.: 61,155
|
QUOTE Radek: *Snort* Ya know Radek, that stuff really messes with your brain after a while. (Which might not necessarily be a bad thing if you want to add to your dazzling collection of wikimedals). QUOTE Radek: "Says the guy [communicat] responsible for the majority of the mindless prattle over the last few weeks." Says the guy who, whenever his neo-nazi views are challenged, can only retort/resnort "Fuck off". Well, as you can see, I'm not fucking off; and I still maintain you're a neo-nazi, despite or because of your unconvincing veneer of intellectual "superiority". This post has been edited by communicat:
|
|
|
|
Milton Roe |
|
Known alias of J. Random Troll
Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined:
Member No.: 5,156
|
QUOTE(communicat @ Mon 17th October 2011, 6:33am) Says the guy who, whenever his neo-nazi views are challenged, can only retort/resnort "Fuck off". Well, as you can see, I'm not fucking off; and I still maintain you're a neo-nazi, despite or because of your unconvincing veneer of intellectual "superiority".
He did give you a very nice synopsis of US involvement in Chile. Be grateful he didn't decide to really squash you about USSR involvement in central Europe. However, by that time he had realized he was dealing with a True Believer, and there was no point. If there's anything worse the people who simply say "fuck off" when they are called neo-nazis, it's people who call anybody whose politics are to the right of Rosa Luxemburg a neo-nazi in the first place.
|
|
|
|
communicat |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 270
Joined:
From: Southern Africa
Member No.: 61,155
|
QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Mon 17th October 2011, 5:20pm) QUOTE(communicat @ Mon 17th October 2011, 6:33am) Says the guy who, whenever his neo-nazi views are challenged, can only retort/resnort "Fuck off". Well, as you can see, I'm not fucking off; and I still maintain you're a neo-nazi, despite or because of your unconvincing veneer of intellectual "superiority".
He did give you a very nice synopsis of US involvement in Chile. Be grateful he didn't decide to really squash you about USSR involvement in central Europe. However, by that time he had realized he was dealing with a True Believer, and there was no point. If there's anything worse the people who simply say "fuck off" when they are called neo-nazis, it's people who call anybody whose politics are to the right of Rosa Luxemburg a neo-nazi in the first place. Get the story right, you banal creep. Radek gave me no "very nice synopsis" about US/Chile. I deliberately distanced myself from that off-topic. His "very nice synopsis" was in fact directed at others including GBG who subsequently demolished Radek's brilliant thesis very nicely, thank you. As regards USSR involvement in central Europe, my only regret is that Radek was not among those at Katyn. Same applies to you.
|
|
|
|
radek |
|
Ãœber Member
Group: Regulars
Posts: 699
Joined:
Member No.: 15,651
|
QUOTE(communicat @ Mon 17th October 2011, 12:03pm) QUOTE(Milton Roe @ Mon 17th October 2011, 5:20pm) QUOTE(communicat @ Mon 17th October 2011, 6:33am) Says the guy who, whenever his neo-nazi views are challenged, can only retort/resnort "Fuck off". Well, as you can see, I'm not fucking off; and I still maintain you're a neo-nazi, despite or because of your unconvincing veneer of intellectual "superiority".
He did give you a very nice synopsis of US involvement in Chile. Be grateful he didn't decide to really squash you about USSR involvement in central Europe. However, by that time he had realized he was dealing with a True Believer, and there was no point. If there's anything worse the people who simply say "fuck off" when they are called neo-nazis, it's people who call anybody whose politics are to the right of Rosa Luxemburg a neo-nazi in the first place. Get the story right, you banal creep. Radek gave me no "very nice synopsis" about US/Chile. I deliberately distanced myself from that off-topic. His "very nice synopsis" was in fact directed at others including GBG who subsequently demolished Radek's brilliant thesis very nicely, thank you. As regards USSR involvement in central Europe, my only regret is that Radek was not among those at Katyn. Same applies to you. When people like you take their masks off and start making racist (yes, yes, I know "Poles" are not a race) and sociopathic remarks like the above, while at the same time whining and self-pitying themselves over how they got banned from some internet forum "unfairly", I know I'm doing something right. Telling a dumb Polack that "he should've died at Katyn" takes no balls. Try something braver. Go insult some other ethnic group along the same lines. Scumbag.
|
|
|
|
Larry Sanger |
|
Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 157
Joined:
Member No.: 19,790
|
On reading the above brilliant exchange of sentiments, my only observation is that, as we grow older, we apparently grow no wiser or more intelligent--just a little less crazy, and the cultural and historical references change from generation to generation.
As to Communicat, it's like this. He's a rabid leftist. As such, he feels morally superior to others who aren't equally far left. He comes here to bait and criticize, as this (ironically) flatters his sense of moral superiority. Others understandably insult him in return. But this only encourages him because after all, if you sincerely believe yourself to be morally superior, insults are only evidence of your moral superiority.
I've already plonked him, myself.
I disagree that WR is going downhill. I find it quite entertaining!
|
|
|
|
communicat |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 270
Joined:
From: Southern Africa
Member No.: 61,155
|
QUOTE(Larry Sanger @ Mon 17th October 2011, 9:43pm) On reading the above brilliant exchange of sentiments, my only observation is that, as we grow older, we apparently grow no wiser or more intelligent--just a little less crazy, and the cultural and historical references change from generation to generation.
As to Communicat, it's like this. He's a rabid leftist. As such, he feels morally superior to others who aren't equally far left. He comes here to bait and criticize, as this (ironically) flatters his sense of moral superiority. Others understandably insult him in return. But this only encourages him because after all, if you sincerely believe yourself to be morally superior, insults are only evidence of your moral superiority.
I've already plonked him, myself.
I disagree that WR is going downhill. I find it quite entertaining!
Nah, you've not plonked me. You've simply and unsrprisingly failed to respond to my earlier remarks about body counts. But you're right about one thing: WR is not going downhill. It's already at the bottom of the cesspool, thanks to rabid wikipedians like you, Radek, and Roe. Funny things is, whenever anyone tries to engage them in reasoned debate about NPOV in WP modern history articles, the topic goes off-topic and then off-off-topic and mudslinging replaces rationality. Why am I not surprised? This post has been edited by communicat:
|
|
|
|
nableezy |
|
Junior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 79
Joined:
From: Somewhere west of Lake Chicago
Member No.: 11,908
|
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 17th October 2011, 7:33pm) Like I get to decide or something.
There was a moment when I thought a small purge could turn the site around. But that moment passed. What do you think the biggest problems are? And if you did get to decide what would you do about it? I think yall have been a bit over accommodating of any banned or blocked editor coming here to complain, at great length, that their ban is unjust, immoral, and all that is wrong with Wikipedia. The other problem is how WR has become co-opted by WP; for many of the people here it is just an extension of the place with some of the rules suspended (I aint gonna lie, thats been me every once in a while). The Annex largely solves that though, but yall should be a bit more aggressive in sending things there. I think this place has a lot to offer. You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it. Actually doing that aint the easiest thing for reasons that can be discussed elsewhere, but when the site focuses on actual criticism of WP it can be immensely useful and, occasionally, insightful.
|
|
|
|
GlassBeadGame |
|
Dharma Bum
Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined:
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981
|
QUOTE(nableezy @ Mon 17th October 2011, 7:53pm) QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 17th October 2011, 7:33pm) Like I get to decide or something.
There was a moment when I thought a small purge could turn the site around. But that moment passed. What do you think the biggest problems are? And if you did get to decide what would you do about it? I think yall have been a bit over accommodating of any banned or blocked editor coming here to complain, at great length, that their ban is unjust, immoral, and all that is wrong with Wikipedia. The other problem is how WR has become co-opted by WP; for many of the people here it is just an extension of the place with some of the rules suspended (I aint gonna lie, thats been me every once in a while). The Annex largely solves that though, but yall should be a bit more aggressive in sending things there. I think this place has a lot to offer. You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it. Actually doing that aint the easiest thing for reasons that can be discussed elsewhere, but when the site focuses on actual criticism of WP it can be immensely useful and, occasionally, insightful. Nice to know that I had influence on somebody on this site. I still believe that any meaningful critique of WP needs to focus on external standards and perspectives. To look at WPs destructive impact on democratic institution such as the press, education, museums and libraries. To confront it's insensitivity to the needs of significant communities outside its own narrow demographics such as Muslims and parents. To expose the risk it presents to children. To oppose the erosion of fundamentally fair notions like people should be paid for work and charities should help people rather than merely provide yet another forum people to say whatever they want. To warn against the corrosive effect of extreme libertarianism and Free Kulture. None of this can be discussed on Wikipedia. Of late none of it can be discussed to any profit on WR. Rather than change or truncate the scope of the critique to fit the new WR it makes more sense to take the heart of the critique elsewhere. It won't be limited to just WP. It it won't be brought by "glassbeadgame." It doesn't need to take a bunch of Wikipedians along. So mostly my interest here is with the damage Wikipedians have done to this and similar sites including confronting the narrowness of their demographics politics and culture. Also to oppose any move to bring in any Wikipedian moderators to facilitate the theft of the site and encourage shutting down the site rather than becoming a Wikipedian noticeboard.
|
|
|
|
mbz1 |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined:
Member No.: 25,791
|
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 18th October 2011, 6:25pm) QUOTE(nableezy @ Mon 17th October 2011, 7:53pm)
I think this place has a lot to offer. You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it. Actually doing that aint the easiest thing for reasons that can be discussed elsewhere, but when the site focuses on actual criticism of WP it can be immensely useful and, occasionally, insightful.
Nice to know that I had influence on somebody on this site. BTW do not believe nableezy, when he says "You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it". No, nableezy, who makes for example this kind of edits (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) will never stop editing wikipedia. What the difference does it make for nableezy, if the article about Israeli Female Basketball Premier League has references or does not have references? What the difference does it make for anybody at all? nableezy is one of the best examples of wikipidiots. Such users will never leave wikipedia. This post has been edited by mbz1:
|
|
|
|
nableezy |
|
Junior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 79
Joined:
From: Somewhere west of Lake Chicago
Member No.: 11,908
|
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 3:05pm) BTW do not believe nableeze, when he says "You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it". No, nableeze, who makes for example this kind of edits (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) will never stop editing wikipedia. What the difference does it make for nableeze, if the article about Israeli Female Basketball Premier League has references or does not have references? What the difference does it make for anybody at all? nableeze is one of the best examples of wikipidiots. Such users will never leave wikipedia. Is there a reason you are unable to properly spell my username? I cant say that anything else you wrote actually matters to me, but this is, if I recall correctly, the second post where you misspell my username multiple times.
|
|
|
|
mbz1 |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined:
Member No.: 25,791
|
QUOTE(nableezy @ Tue 18th October 2011, 8:10pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 3:05pm) BTW do not believe nableezy, when he says "You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it". No, nableezy, who makes for example this kind of edits (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) will never stop editing wikipedia. What the difference does it make for nableezy , if the article about Israeli Female Basketball Premier League has references or does not have references? What the difference does it make for anybody at all? nableezy is one of the best examples of wikipidiots. Such users will never leave wikipedia. Is there a reason you are unable to properly spell my username? I cant say that anything else you wrote actually matters to me, but this is, if I recall correctly, the second post where you misspell my username multiple times. Sorry, I fixed it. BTW what does your user name mean? Is it something as hateful as you avatar? Why have you chosen Che Guevara for your avatar anyway? Do you like Che Guevara? Have you by any chance read this article written by a very, very left journalist about Che Guevara, or you know Che Guevara only from "neutral" Wikipedia entry on him? This post has been edited by mbz1:
|
|
|
|
communicat |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 270
Joined:
From: Southern Africa
Member No.: 61,155
|
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 10:13pm) QUOTE(nableezy @ Tue 18th October 2011, 8:10pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 3:05pm) BTW do not believe nableezy, when he says "You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it". No, nableezy, who makes for example this kind of edits (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) will never stop editing wikipedia. What the difference does it make for nableezy , if the article about Israeli Female Basketball Premier League has references or does not have references? What the difference does it make for anybody at all? nableezy is one of the best examples of wikipidiots. Such users will never leave wikipedia. Is there a reason you are unable to properly spell my username? I cant say that anything else you wrote actually matters to me, but this is, if I recall correctly, the second post where you misspell my username multiple times. Sorry, I fixed it. BTW what does your user name mean? Is it something as hateful as you avatar? Why have you chosen Che Guevara for your avatar anyway? Do you like Che Guevara? Have you by any chance read this article written by a very, very left journalist about Che Guevara, or you know Che Guevara only from "neutral" Wikipedia entry on him? Noise, noise, noise. Who, apart from nabliesi gives a damn about the spelling of his name? As for Johann Hari -- author of the Guevara article -- being "a very, very left journalist", are you MBZi out of your mind? Hari is as rabidly conservative as they come; nor is The Independent newspaper much better. As a "journalist", Hari has been forced to apologise publicly for plagiarism and for using WP to make malicious attacks under a pseudonym. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Hari That's the kinda guy you're trying to pass off as a reliable source. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/fool.gif) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/frustrated.gif) This post has been edited by communicat:
|
|
|
|
mbz1 |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined:
Member No.: 25,791
|
QUOTE(communicat @ Tue 18th October 2011, 9:00pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 10:13pm) QUOTE(nableezy @ Tue 18th October 2011, 8:10pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 3:05pm) BTW do not believe nableezy, when he says "You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it". No, nableezy, who makes for example this kind of edits (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) will never stop editing wikipedia. What the difference does it make for nableezy , if the article about Israeli Female Basketball Premier League has references or does not have references? What the difference does it make for anybody at all? nableezy is one of the best examples of wikipidiots. Such users will never leave wikipedia. Is there a reason you are unable to properly spell my username? I cant say that anything else you wrote actually matters to me, but this is, if I recall correctly, the second post where you misspell my username multiple times. Sorry, I fixed it. BTW what does your user name mean? Is it something as hateful as you avatar? Why have you chosen Che Guevara for your avatar anyway? Do you like Che Guevara? Have you by any chance read this article written by a very, very left journalist about Che Guevara, or you know Che Guevara only from "neutral" Wikipedia entry on him? Noise, noise, noise. Who, apart from nabliesi gives a damn about the spelling of his name? As for Johann Hari -- author of the Guevara article -- being "a very, very left journalist", are you MBZi [sic] (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) out of your mind? Hari is as rabidly conservative as they come; nor is The Independent newspaper much better. As a "journalist", Hari has been forced to apologise publicly for plagiarism and for using WP to make malicious attacks under a pseudonym. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Hari That's the kinda guy you're trying to pass off as a reliable source. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/fool.gif) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/frustrated.gif) Of course I know that " Hari has been forced to apologise publicly for plagiarism and for using WP to make malicious attacks under a pseudonym. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Hari" . So what, you, (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/fool.gif), (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) ?Do you really believe that left , liberal journalists do not write plagiarisms and do not make socks on wikipedia?
|
|
|
|
communicat |
|
Senior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 270
Joined:
From: Southern Africa
Member No.: 61,155
|
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 11:28pm) QUOTE(communicat @ Tue 18th October 2011, 9:00pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 10:13pm) QUOTE(nableezy @ Tue 18th October 2011, 8:10pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 3:05pm) BTW do not believe nableezy, when he says "You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it". No, nableezy, who makes for example this kind of edits (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) will never stop editing wikipedia. What the difference does it make for nableezy , if the article about Israeli Female Basketball Premier League has references or does not have references? What the difference does it make for anybody at all? nableezy is one of the best examples of wikipidiots. Such users will never leave wikipedia. Is there a reason you are unable to properly spell my username? I cant say that anything else you wrote actually matters to me, but this is, if I recall correctly, the second post where you misspell my username multiple times. Sorry, I fixed it. BTW what does your user name mean? Is it something as hateful as you avatar? Why have you chosen Che Guevara for your avatar anyway? Do you like Che Guevara? Have you by any chance read this article written by a very, very left journalist about Che Guevara, or you know Che Guevara only from "neutral" Wikipedia entry on him? Noise, noise, noise. Who, apart from nabliesi gives a damn about the spelling of his name? As for Johann Hari -- author of the Guevara article -- being "a very, very left journalist", are you MBZi [sic] (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) out of your mind? Hari is as rabidly conservative as they come; nor is The Independent newspaper much better. As a "journalist", Hari has been forced to apologise publicly for plagiarism and for using WP to make malicious attacks under a pseudonym. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Hari That's the kinda guy you're trying to pass off as a reliable source. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/fool.gif) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/frustrated.gif) Of course I know that " Hari has been forced to apologise publicly for plagiarism and for using WP to make malicious attacks under a pseudonym. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Hari" . So what, you, (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/fool.gif), (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) ?Do you really believe that left , liberal journalists do not write plagiarisms and do not make socks on wikipedia? I don't have time for childish nonsense. Go back to WP. They thrive on that kind of thing. Same applies to nabliesi. And to kohs, for that matter. This post has been edited by communicat:
|
|
|
|
GlassBeadGame |
|
Dharma Bum
Group: Contributors
Posts: 7,919
Joined:
From: My name it means nothing. My age it means less. The country I come from is called the Mid-West.
Member No.: 981
|
QUOTE(communicat @ Tue 18th October 2011, 4:06pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 11:28pm) QUOTE(communicat @ Tue 18th October 2011, 9:00pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 10:13pm) QUOTE(nableezy @ Tue 18th October 2011, 8:10pm) QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 18th October 2011, 3:05pm) BTW do not believe nableezy, when he says "You, particularly, have convinced me that not only is WP bad, but that the only responsible thing to do with it is to stop editing it". No, nableezy, who makes for example this kind of edits (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/hrmph.gif) will never stop editing wikipedia. What the difference does it make for nableezy , if the article about Israeli Female Basketball Premier League has references or does not have references? What the difference does it make for anybody at all? nableezy is one of the best examples of wikipidiots. Such users will never leave wikipedia. Is there a reason you are unable to properly spell my username? I cant say that anything else you wrote actually matters to me, but this is, if I recall correctly, the second post where you misspell my username multiple times. Sorry, I fixed it. BTW what does your user name mean? Is it something as hateful as you avatar? Why have you chosen Che Guevara for your avatar anyway? Do you like Che Guevara? Have you by any chance read this article written by a very, very left journalist about Che Guevara, or you know Che Guevara only from "neutral" Wikipedia entry on him? Noise, noise, noise. Who, apart from nabliesi gives a damn about the spelling of his name? As for Johann Hari -- author of the Guevara article -- being "a very, very left journalist", are you MBZi [sic] (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) out of your mind? Hari is as rabidly conservative as they come; nor is The Independent newspaper much better. As a "journalist", Hari has been forced to apologise publicly for plagiarism and for using WP to make malicious attacks under a pseudonym. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Hari That's the kinda guy you're trying to pass off as a reliable source. (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/fool.gif) (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/frustrated.gif) Of course I know that " Hari has been forced to apologise publicly for plagiarism and for using WP to make malicious attacks under a pseudonym. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johann_Hari" . So what, you, (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/fool.gif), (IMG: smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif) ?Do you really believe that left , liberal journalists do not write plagiarisms and do not make socks on wikipedia? I don't have time for childish nonsense. Go back to WP. They thrive on that kind of thing. Same applies to nabliesi. And to kohs, for that matter. Just chill for Christ's sake.
|
|
|
|
nableezy |
|
Junior Member
Group: Contributors
Posts: 79
Joined:
From: Somewhere west of Lake Chicago
Member No.: 11,908
|
QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Tue 18th October 2011, 5:14pm) Just chill for Christ's sake.
Might the posts related to WR specifically be moved to the WR review forum? That would have the benefit of allowing me to continue the discussion that has a purpose while ignoring everything else.
|
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
communicat Moral bankruptcy? Michaeldsuarez It's reminiscent of the Catholic leading figur... Milton Roe
It's reminiscent of the Catholic leading figu... Larry Sanger
Old fashioned pacifists (and even WP:NPOV rules, ... Milton Roe
Old fashioned pacifists (and even WP:NPOV rules, ... GlassBeadGame
Old fashioned pacifists (and even WP:NPOV rules,... Milton Roe
[quote name='Milton Roe' post='286461' date='Fri ... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='286469' date='F... thekohser Why is this in "General Discussion", and... GlassBeadGame
Why is this in "General Discussion", an... SB_Johnny
Why is this in "General Discussion", a... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='286489' date='F... communicat
[quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='286489' date='... radek
[quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='286595' date='S... The Joy
[quote name='thekohser' post='286480' date='Fri ... SB_Johnny
No offense GBG (because I completely understand ... communicat
Why is this in "General Discussion", a... communicat
Why is this in "General Discussion", an... communicat
Allow me to correct my statement. My own subjecti... communicat
Okay Mr Sanger. Let's overlook conveniently ... communicat
Wow! I'll accept that as a compliment. Di... thekohser
Wow! I'll accept that as a compliment. D... communicat
Wow! I'll accept that as a compliment. ... radek
[quote name='thekohser' post='286525' date='Sat 1... communicat
[quote name='thekohser' post='286525' date='Sat ... radek
[quote name='radek' post='286533' date='Sat 15th ... SB_Johnny
[quote name='thekohser' post='286525' date='Sat 1... Vigilant
[quote name='thekohser' post='286525' date='Sat ... communicat
[quote name='thekohser' post='286525' date='Sat ... thekohser
...who if anyone funds WR? Simple question, merit... communicat
...who if anyone funds WR? Simple question, meri... Zoloft Communicat. WR is actually a grass-roots endeavor.... communicat
Communicat. WR is actually a grass-roots endeavor... EricBarbour Never mind. I will tell you the truth. WR is a rar... Milton Roe
As regards USSR involvement in central Europe, my... communicat
[quote name='Milton Roe' post='286633' date='Mon... The Joy
On reading the above brilliant exchange of senti... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='communicat' post='286682' date='Mon ... communicat
[quote name='communicat' post='286682' date='Mon ... Milton Roe
Larry Sanger is a "rabid Wikipedian!?... radek
Like I get to decide or something.
There was a m... The Joy
[quote name='nableezy' post='286712' date='Mon 17... GlassBeadGame
I think some of this has to do with the Malice ... radek
I think some of this has to do with the Malice... GlassBeadGame
[quote name='GlassBeadGame' post='286718' date='M... mbz1
Nice to know that I had influence on somebody on... GlassBeadGame
Nice to know that I had influence on somebody o... nableezy Who, apart from nabliesi gives a damn about the s... SB_Johnny
Just chill for Christ's sake.
I resemble that... communicat
Just chill for Christ's sake.
Might the post... nableezy Nice to know that I had influence on somebody on t... thekohser
If it is any consolation sometimes I feel the sam... Kelly Martin The one thing I find disagreeable about communicat... communicat
The one thing I find disagreeable about communica... communicat
Crowd sourcing produces excessive noise. Expert i... communicat
Watch it pal; any moment now someone here's ... Rhindle I think a good example could be in how do you hand... The Joy
I think a good example could be in how do you han... communicat
I think a good example could be in how do you ha... EricBarbour -_- :yecch: communicat
-_- :yecch:
Don't wake him up. He'll o...
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |