The worst wikipedia administrators are power hungry, bully administrators as Sandstein and even more so Gwen Gale.
Bully administrators vandalize the most important asset wikipedia has - contributors.
Here's what HJ Mitchell said about Sandstein QUOTE
that you reach for the block button without any consideration of "is this the right thing to do" or "is there another way I can handle this"..."You lack the judgement, and the thickness of skin, to do the job properly; you lack the compassion, humanity and humility to admit it when you fuck up
This applies to Gwen Gale much more than it does to Sandstein.
Gwen Gale responds to canvassing, she is acting, when involved, she misuses her tools over and over and over again.
She lied in her RfAs.
Gwen Gale herself made more disruptions, and more personal attacks than half of the editors she blocked.
I could confirm all of above with the differences, if somebody likes to see them but for now
let's compare Gwen Gale's behavior as a blocked user with Gwen Gale's behavior as a blocking administrator:
Gwen Gale is a blocked user:Here's her reaction for 24 hours blockQUOTE
There are too many of them for me here, too many role-playing troll admins, too many troll sockpuppet editors. Bye then. Gwen Gale 06:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Yet her blocking administrator did not change the duration of her block.
Gwen Gale as a blocking administrator. Gwen Gale is changing block settings to indefinite only because the editor requested a blocked user template.
This idiotic block was undone in an hour or so, but how many were not?
This post has been edited by mbz1: