The G5 people have a logical point - if the community bans someone, why would we allow them any ability to continue furthering themselves. By allowing their edits to continue without anyone verifying them, or taking the responsibility upon themselves, what you are effectively saying is "oh, go ahead and sock as much as you want."
This is the equivalent of kicking a guy out of a football team for unnecessary roughness but allowing his "brother" who is the same guy with only a drawn on mustache to play.
If you are going to have any kind of ban, then you really need something like this. Otherwise, the ban becomes useless. Now, you can just toss out the bans, but yeah. It is all about consistency. G5 is consistent.
|