QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Mon 21st November 2011, 7:35pm)
QUOTE(Malleus @ Mon 21st November 2011, 2:18pm)
QUOTE(A Horse With No Name @ Mon 21st November 2011, 4:47pm)
You're getting this from the Horsey's mouth: according to a very reliable source, I hear everybody's favorite old bag, Risker, has "strong reason" to believe that the list leaker was none other than the last Boy Scout himself, Rlevse. In Risker's mind, Rlevse still had some old access, emails, etc. It is also why the information was targeted in one direction (mostly against old enemies).
Do you think that Risker is on the right track? Or is she be sticking her thermometer in the wrong orifice? (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/smile.gif)
Makes as least as much sense as any other explanation I've seen, and more than most.
So are you done wasting people's time on this dreary shit? Little is worse than Wikiphedians manipulating and betraying each others with their "state secretes" and special inside sources.
I could have agreed with you on this one, if you were consistent, but here's the thing:Malice was allowed to go on with his posts, without you or anybody else for that matter trying to stop it.
I have not read all leaks, but I believe that some people (I do not mean any of the arbitrators) were really, really hurt by Malice's posts.
So, if Malice posts were allowed, nothing is off the table now.
I'd like to believe that Rlevse is not the leaker.