As promised earlier here is the editing table updated with the new candidates.
http://www.logicmuseum.com/x/index.php?tit...diting_patternsIts primary sort order is by ‘A max’, which indicates how ‘focused’ an editor is. A high number signifies focus on one particular page. This correlates highly with content creators. A low number suggests highly repetitive ‘gnome’ work.
Keep in mind that the sampling was the last 5,000 edits (or all edits, whichever is lower). This may have unfairly disadvantaged editors like Courcelles, who has 5,000 edits this month alone, and more than 100,000 since inception. But then you have to ask why someone is making 5,000 edits a month.
In descending order of usefulness:
Panyd Scores 187 on focus, which is high for the group, but actually this is for Template talk:Did you know (templates count as article work). The first article we come to is 50 Berkeley Square ‎which is only 15 edits. Suggests a ‘gnome’
NWA.RepHas only 4,000 edits. Focus score is 98, for Culture of Taiwan, followed by 92 for List of Chinese Americans. There should be a weighting factor for any list article, perhaps even a negative weight, but I haven’t implemented this.
Eluchil404Focus score 68 for Skandar Keynes.
Worm That TurnedFocus 65 for ‘Pasty’, followed by 26 for ‘BLT’, an article about a sandwich.
SilkTorkScores 64 for Eastbourne.
KwwFocus 58 for Selena Gomez & the Scene discography. Most of his article edits are related to Selena Gomez (who she?).
JclemensFocus 49 for the talk page of Talk:Family Research Council.
Roger Davies28 for Jonathan Sumption. A low value which may not reflect earlier content work – remember this test looks only at the last 5,000 edits.
Hot StopFocus 28 for George Godsey (football coach). Only 900 edits available.
DeltaQuadFocus of 8 for Template:Proxycheckstatus. This low number puts DQ in the good company of Hersfold and Courcelles. Only 973 edits to articles, the balance being 1691 for user space, 2335 for Wikipedia space. Top edited page in Wikipedia space was “Wikipedia:Requests for page protectionâ€. Also very involved in sockpuppet investigation.
This post has been edited by Peter Damian: