QUOTE(Zoloft @ Fri 9th December 2011, 6:57am)
QUOTE(thekohser @ Thu 8th December 2011, 6:43pm)
Who is this "previousdenial" character on Independent? He says of me:
QUOTE
I am a decent person and you are a dishonest self-enriching hypocritical piece of keech. You smear Wikipedia while driving around WiFi hotspots disguising your IP and inventing new identities in order to post lies for cash. Rest assured that once I've investigated Bell Pottinger to my satisfaction then I'll start tracing your malign influence.
He makes you sound a bit like a supervillain. Do you have a white cat willing to sit in your lap? I would send you a monocle.
He looks to me like an arrogant paranoid who uses the Independent like Facebook, at least looking at his Scottish "pro independence" edits (which says it all in terms of common sense). He looks like he just hates Pottinger and knows little or nothing about Wikipedia. Those Facebook types on comment pages always seem to want the last word, and have little sense of putting new information in their posts. It would be interesting if he really was a Wikipedian, but I doubt it. What's interesting to me is people's response to what is "ethical" or not on Wikipedia. Of course St. Jimbo will always lead the way on this: Wikipedia is innocent and pure, and only a few "unethical" villains soil it.
This post has been edited by powercorrupts: