QUOTE(opinionated spectator @ Fri 9th December 2011, 6:00am)
QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Wed 7th December 2011, 5:52pm)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Mis...on/User:NWA.Rephttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...r=2011&month=12http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...r=2011&month=12I see that the Wikipedians are giving candidate NWA.Rep a tough time. Seeing NWA.Rep's recent contributions, it appears as if they're frustrating him to the point where he might retire from editing again.
It is really a pity. He is the Ron Paul of Wikipedia. His viewpoints resonate with Wikipedians who only casually edit the encyclopedia, but the establishment do not want someone to challenge them. Many of the Wikipedians who are stirring up trouble about his userpage this time apparently are the same ones who urge the community to vote against him on their candidate guides.
I think the Wikipedians are clearly baiting him to get him blocked during election. They knew from past precedents (not the first time his userpage was nominated for deletion or being edit warred over) how he would react. So they keep poking until they get a reaction out of him. It would be a pity if he retires again.
I know nothing about NWA.Rep , but I do know Anna Frodesiak. She's one of wikipedia bullies. Once she bullied me to a point that an admin removed her bullying from my talk, and warned her not to re-post it.