QUOTE(Malleus @ Sat 24th December 2011, 4:51pm)
QUOTE(mbz1 @ Sat 24th December 2011, 4:14pm)
QUOTE(TungstenCarbide @ Sat 24th December 2011, 4:16am)
Malleus, I'd like to ask you please. Let's say your arbitration case is rejected, as I believe it would,
will you go back to wikipedia, maybe not on 12/29/2011, but later on? Thanks.
Not unless it resulted in a fundamental change in the way that Wikipedia is run.
In all of its existence, has there
ever been a "fundamental change in he way Wikipedia is run"?
Wikipedia is, as I've long said, structurally incapable of fundamental change. The only person who could have changed the structure was Jimbo, but he never had the will, and now he lacks both the will and the power.
However, becoming tolerant of potty-mouths isn't my idea of fundamental change anyway.
This post has been edited by Doc glasgow: