I find
this comment interesting:
QUOTE
If I was the boss of a company, I wouldn't fire my best employee for pissing off everyone else, especially if he or she actually gets shit done. Let's face it: Malleus is worth more to Wikipedia than five admins.
Why not let Malleus have immunity because of his usefulness? Is calling someone a cunt (even if regularly done over several years) that bad, considering this is the Internet?
If someone leaves Wikipedia "because" of Malleus, it's their choice.
Fetchcomms is mistaking: Malleus is worth more to Wikipedia than at least a hundred admins, probably more, but does it mean Malleus and other valued editors should be treated differently than not so valued, but good faith editors?
I have no answer to this question, but I would like to hear what others think about this matter. Thanks.
This post has been edited by mbz1: