QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Fri 30th December 2011, 1:26am)
If and when Mr. Murphy's article, reportedly being written for the Christian Science Monitor (a highly reputable publication), appears, it will certainly lead to some press attention being focused on at least two people: Mr. Van Haeften, and Jimbo Wales. This is not the sort of attention Jimmy-boy wants, and he'll almost certainly take it out on Van Haeften, because the CSM is simply too influential and respectable for him to poo-poo under the carpet (as he routinely does with the Register and Gawker). Simply put, someone has to be In The Wrong here, and even Jimmy knows that he's not going to succeed if he tries to make it the CSM.
As quoted earlier in this thread,
Murphy said,
QUOTE
Though I’m a reporter/editor at the Christian Science Monitor, I won’t be doing this story for them (for 3 reasons: I’ll be writing this from a first person perspective, something the CSM rarely does; it’s outside my remit; and some of the material I’ll need to cover will be too explicit for us).
That post was removed from Ashley's talk page by the new wikipedia arbiter, AGK of Cambuslang, Scotland.
This post has been edited by tarantino: