QUOTE
No matter how carefully you, Ottava, Alison, RHMED, Barbour, SBJohnny and the other right-wing activists over at WR craft your words the nastiness leaks through. You're opposing Ashley because he's gay. You don't like him. His uploads make you feel icky. Whatever. As it I mentioned above it just happens you've revealed a real flaw in his candidacy but save us the wide-eyed innocence. Y'all would have opposed his candidacy even if he was as pure as the Risen Lord. Lovetinkle (talk) 18:04, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
I would say something about this on Commons, but don't want to give them an opportunity to "block" for "disruption".
Mister "Lovetinkle", your username is pathetically funny. You're a sock of someone, yes?
And how dare you make pronouncements about my personal politics. You don't know me personally.
Calling someone a "homophobe" is a venerable tradition on Wikipedia, to shut down and destroy
opponents.
Let me make it clear: I don't care about Mr. Van Haeften's sexual life. He's an adult, if he wants
to engage in the most disgusting sexual practices possible with other consenting adults, that's fine with me.
I don't even care if he posts numerous photos of his dong and his hairy ass on Commons,
although it's generally a bad idea for an alleged "educational resource".
I DO care about his attempt to cover up his past activities on en-wiki and Commons, and the
attempts by his admin buddies, all of whom are abusing their power to do so. And Dan Murphy's
comments being censored out of existence, that was the last straw.I know you're reading this thread, troll. The Fae business is only the tip of a very large and nasty
iceberg, one that I did not help to create. Your friend Fae did some of that, actually. (Assuming,
of course, you're not Fae's sock account. Which, knowing Wikipedia, is probable.)
This post has been edited by EricBarbour: