QUOTE(Vigilant @ Tue 21st February 2012, 10:51am)
It's so funny how Catholic-esque(medieval) wikipedia is.
The self flagellation, the kissing of the ring, the confession, the scourging, etc.
And all of it long after the actual sins were committed.....
the hellstorm happens, and Arbcom sits on their hands, until years later.
QUOTE
3) The community is encouraged to open a Request for comment on the "Conflicts of Interest" guideline with a view to reconciling some of the apparent contradictions discussed in the applicable finding of fact above.
Oh yeah, that's a
great idea.
QUOTE
He would, of course, be welcomed here as a member.
Of course, although I think the likelihood of that happening is on a par with the chances of the sun exploding in the next 5 minutes.
He is, unquestionably, one of Wikipedia's most intractable, evil content-controllers. His history needs to be preserved so others can see what being a manipulative, obsessed maniac actually accomplishes.
Now I have to go and update his wiki article.
(You folks do realize he's just going to go back to the same old thing, pwning the same articles, once this blows over?
He's still
fucking around on the Lyndon LaRouche talkpage. He needs to be locked up, not "topic-banned".)
This post has been edited by EricBarbour: