QUOTE(Wikitaka @ Sun 25th March 2012, 6:39am)
For no reason, Xavexgoem
protected the Muhammad RFC "to avoid SPIs", which is not a valid reason for semi-protection.
What else does Xavexgoem have on his record?
It has nothing to do with Xavexgoem.
The WMF controversial content study recommended that the image discussion be limited to registered users, as the subject area has had a history of insipid "REMOVE IMAGES THEY OFFEND MEEEEEEE!" retardation from IPs and single-purpose-accounts over the years.