QUOTE(jsalsman @ Wed 4th April 2012, 10:02pm)
I used to be for including images until I found out that no contemporary depictions of Muhammad even exist. It's not about aniconism vs. NOTCENSORED, it's that there aren't any actual images of Muhammad. They are all made up, cartoons of someone else. So don't put any in the main article. Anyone who sees an image in the main article will be misled into thinking Muhammad may have looked like that when he didn't. That's completely unencyclopedic. Make a separate [[Depictions of Muhammad]] article and put them all there with a clear statement that they are all bogus in the first sentence.
So you used to be enlightened, but then became corrupted by someone's ignorant argument. Are you on the administrator fast track yet?
This post has been edited by Tarc: