Well the portrait for King Richard III (at least the one that greets you upon looking at the article) was only painted around 35 years after he died and was, presumably, based on how he actually looked like.
Why is it wrong to not have portrayals in an article directly about Muhammad when his actually adherents would find said portrayals offensive? "Wikipedia is not censored" doesn't apply, no one is getting arrested for putting them up, the FBI isn't calling on Wikipedia to take them down.
|