![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
tarantino |
![]()
Post
#1
|
the Dude abides ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,441 Joined: Member No.: 2,143 ![]() |
The Libertarian candidate in 2008 for Virginia's 1st congressional district and and one of Abd's former mentors [1] had another account blocked August 11 2010.
He recently spent 14 months in prison for threatening to kill the president, and has just now decided not to comply with his conditions of supervised release. His autobiography is here, and the letter sent to his probation officer is here. [1] I had some good mentors early on, most notably an editor known by many names, a long-term Wikipedian who, for his own reasons, kept dropping accounts and starting up new ones, though under (originally) no sanctions. He never used two accounts simultaneously, never went back to old accounts, and all were acknowledged or blatantly obvious, far from concealed. One of the names was Sarsaparilla, it's not hard at all to find another going back about two years before I met him. Older accounts he never revealed even to me, and he had real-life reasons to avoid disclosing them, he claimed. |
![]() ![]() |
Michaeldsuarez |
![]()
Post
#2
|
Ãœber Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 562 Joined: From: New York, New York Member No.: 24,428 ![]() |
http://nathania.org/wiki/User:Nathan_Larson/Wikiprudery (NSFW)
http://nathania.org/wiki/User:Nathan_Larson/Boylove (NSFW) http://en.boywiki.org/w/index.php?title=Sp...r%3ALeucosticte (NSFW) Edit: Adding warnings per the requests below. This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez: |
The Joy |
![]()
Post
#3
|
I am a millipede! I am amazing! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3,839 Joined: From: The Moon Member No.: 982 ![]() |
http://nathania.org/wiki/User:Nathan_Larson/Wikiprudery http://nathania.org/wiki/User:Nathan_Larson/Boylove http://en.boywiki.org/w/index.php?title=Sp...r%3ALeucosticte (IMG:http://i186.photobucket.com/albums/x136/Morpheus7678/Oh_lawd.jpg) Does Hipocrite post here? Has he made contact with the FBI about this guy? (Need major NSFW warnings for those links! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/sick.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/wtf.gif)) |
Abd |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Postmaster ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,919 Joined: From: Northampton, MA, USA Member No.: 9,019 ![]() |
Does Hipocrite post here? Has he made contact with the FBI about this guy? He claimed to have done so, through a reporting link. I referred to that above. In order to make the report he had to misrepresent the facts. Since it wasn't made directly to the FBI, it might not be illegal, that false report, but it still is scuzzy, because it wastes the time of an organization dedicated to protecting children.QUOTE (Need major NSFW warnings for those links! (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/sick.gif) (IMG:smilys0b23ax56/default/wtf.gif)) Well, no. His point and my point. (the smilies show a common response to some kinds of pornography: simultaneous attraction and repulsion) (the two pages are different, the first has no pornography, the second has pornographic text. A famous piece of it, in fact. Apparently not illegal.)The Wikiprudery essay has one small photo with it. It shows a young woman, playing the piano, nude. How I'd respond, as your boss, to your viewing that page would have little to do with the photo, though maybe I might feel differently depending on what you were doing when I walked into your office. I'd be more concerned that you were reading something that has nothing to do with work. The same as without the photo. The photo itself is not pornography, nor even erotic, necessarily. The woman might or might not be a child, but it does not matter legally, because this is not child porn. The Boylove commentary has no photos. It has an excerpt from The Lolita Method. If you fear that a piece of erotic text will flip you into illegal or harmful behavior, indeed, I don't recommend reading this. I.e., if you are a pedophile trying to stay legal. However, there is a blatant contradiction here. A knee-jerk response to the Boylove page might be that he's a "Boylover." Yet he obviously is not, and that contradicts the impression one might get from the "Lolita Method" excerpt, that he could be a pedophile preferring girls. In fact, he is neither. Nothing about these pages would lead to a diagnosis of pedophilia of any kind. Except for people who are completely clueless and who react strongly to mild stimuli. These people, in fact, could be far more worrisome if and when they are in contact with children, than Tisane. Tisane is doing exactly what he says he's doing, big surprise, plus he's doing something else. What he says he's doing is researching the issue of child/adults sex, as a political issue, that is his "interest," and what else he is doing is very effectively trolling for outraged response. He's good at it, obviously. Wikiprudery, indeed. Are you going to report this to the FBI? It's more deserving of it. Now, there's an image that is NSFW. Hosted on Wikimedia Commons. (Child pornography!) This post has been edited by Abd: |
Ottava |
![]()
Post
#5
|
Ãœber Pokemon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 2,917 Joined: Member No.: 7,328 ![]() |
|
Fusion |
![]()
Post
#6
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 346 Joined: Member No.: 71,526 ![]() |
(A famous piece of it, in fact. Apparently not illegal.) It is rather sad that Abd thinks that "legal" and "famous" are connected. Illegal is illegal. Surely the claims here are that it is not illegal and that it is famous. It is not asserted that it is legal because it is famous, or that it is famous because it is legal. As to whether it is indeed illegal I express no comment. No doubt Ottava has an opinion from a notable lawyer on that subject. |
Ottava |
![]()
Post
#7
|
Ãœber Pokemon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 2,917 Joined: Member No.: 7,328 ![]() |
(A famous piece of it, in fact. Apparently not illegal.) It is rather sad that Abd thinks that "legal" and "famous" are connected. Illegal is illegal. Surely the claims here are that it is not illegal and that it is famous. It is not asserted that it is legal because it is famous, or that it is famous because it is legal. As to whether it is indeed illegal I express no comment. No doubt Ottava has an opinion from a notable lawyer on that subject. Why would the lawyer have to be notable? o.O |
Detective |
![]()
Post
#8
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 331 Joined: Member No.: 35,179 ![]() |
No doubt Ottava has an opinion from a notable lawyer on that subject. Why would the lawyer have to be notable? o.O Dear me, you do ask ridiculously easy questions. Because if he's not notable, he won't have an article on Wikipedia so we won't know if he's gay or whatever. |
Ottava |
![]()
Post
#9
|
Ãœber Pokemon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 2,917 Joined: Member No.: 7,328 ![]() |
No doubt Ottava has an opinion from a notable lawyer on that subject. Why would the lawyer have to be notable? o.O Dear me, you do ask ridiculously easy questions. Because if he's not notable, he won't have an article on Wikipedia so we won't know if he's gay or whatever. Haha, nice. Fusion QUOTE I mean that the lawyer is well known within the legal profession as an expert in the subject. No lawyer is an expert on the subject. Lawyers fight on a side. They are not the judges. Even judges aren't the ultimate deciders as there are always appeals that can overrule. There are laws in most countries banning the graphic depiction in that "book" (it is a pedophile fanfiction). This post has been edited by Ottava: |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |