QUOTE(everyking @ Sun 18th November 2007, 1:07pm)
It's just unbelievable that such an indisputably good contributor could be blocked without even a shred of evidence being presented. I hope this isn't the wave of the future, out of the blue blocks of good contributors based on secret investigative techniques with no opportunity for community review.
Oh come on Everyking!
She's done this dozens of times. Only this time she did it to a 100+ contributor, and she's earned her self such a reputation that: 1) She's been awarded her very own newspaper article, as the
Poster Child of corrupt Wikipedia Administrators. 2) She's harassed and stalked the otherwise mild-mannered Kohs, attempting to defame him to newsmen. 3) Her body count is getting beyong plausible deniability. At this point, he's even starting to embarass the average WP administrator (not an easy task).
A more lucid power-mad admin would lay low, but not our heroine. She's stomping right onto the thin ice that befits a lass so sure of her own 'good guesses' that she's willing to stake
YOUR reputation on it.
(and the reputation of your business).This post has been edited by Disillusioned Lackey: