Jehochman and Durova are
complaining that Krimpet keeps
restoring posts to the ANI discussion from a banned user using TOR.
The reappearing post-
QUOTE
Durova did the same thing to me the other day when she indefinitely blocked me for being a sockpuppet of Wikipedia Review on the basis of "secret evidence." This excuse about not publically revealing her propriatary techniques, lest the trolls catch on, all sounds quite clever and responsible until one realizes that she doesn't have the faintest clue of what she's doing. Expect much more of the same if Durova makes her way onto the Arbitration Committee, when puzzled observers can assure themselves that, as an arbitrator,Durova must know something that they don't. She doesn't. Based as they are upon an appeal to her track record, rather than to any evidence, her acccusations have proven too unrelilable to be of any value..[[User:24.19.33.82|24.19.33.82]] 00:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Picaroon asks "One, which banned user is this alleged to be? Two, since when is Wikipedia:Deny recognition policy?"
One problem I see, though, the
ip's not actually a TOR node.