QUOTE(Emperor @ Wed 21st November 2007, 5:54pm)
QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Wed 21st November 2007, 2:07pm)
Here is an [example redacted] that got Jimbo upset (he seemed to think that I was endangering his daughter, blah, blah) so I don't link to it anymore. I may go back to linking to it now that I'm rebanned anyway. It's an excellent piece of work, as you can plainly see.
I followed the link. I think you're trying to be funny, but the effect is rather sad, creepy, and vaguely threatening. I agree with Jimbo on this. Tactics like that have nothing to do with legitimate criticism and cast us in a really poor light.
I'm surprised no one else here has objected yet.
I agree. As awful as Jimbo is, I don't agree with putting his kids face online. They are already kidnapping risks, due to his fame (he should hire bodyguards) so pictures like this are quite dangerous. The CEO of Adobe was kidnapped in the last 1990s, and most hi-tech moguls have bodyguards, after that happened. Jimbo has the fame, but not the big bucks, so he's probably high risk without bodyguards.
She's just a little girl. Wikipedia's problems aren't her fault.
The idea of a kid being an admin is funny, but I'd use a fair use picture for that.