this caused a red sock alarm to go off when sami pulled this passive-aggressive act. another tendency that could probably be tracked to time of day with gary, lol.
Modus operandi - blank a well-sourced edit to provoke. Revert the revert with sock in a rigged 3RR game. Claim that you hate involved people. When stink raised, use passive-aggressive "don't be so crazy-angry" retort.
QUOTE
:If it will calm you down, go ahead and revert the link or article from a reporter that you clearly despise. I don't want to keep you up nights about this.--[[User:Samiharris|Samiharris]] 03:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=143888418QUOTE
If you're going to have a nervous breakdown concerning one paragraph of that article, please do it there so that other editors can read your comments.--Mantanmoreland 03:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Piperdownin neither of these cases was my talk page edits in any way over-board, except in expansion of talking points. this is what gary does. passive-aggressive entrapment and baiting. it worked so well when with User:Ptmccain.
_____________________________
GW Herbert, the WR Hall of Famer, keeps on giving on the Evidence talk page.
- He was "up 32 hours straight"
- Bagley has admitted to being wordbomb so it's OK to violate his ass, er, um, BLP all over WP with rape imagery per Crum375, and for starting the National Front movement per other admins crazed over their friends getting caught wikilying
I think it's time some of the trainspotters compiling the JzG list just go ahead and compile a
WP:BLP violations list
So that everyone can seen just how equally Slum & Friends apply it.
______________________
JimboArbcom is now playing a game of chicken, todays Crum for Slim War was just an excuse for a convenient truth delay.
Byrne's Deep Captured Garymails to the press Vs. MM Arb outcome
Who's going to blink first?
I'd believe Byrne & Bagley about Gary writing in his emails about his book-pumping exploits on WP, and which sock edits those emails are timed with. B&B have a pretty good track record so far on who's telling the truth when show&tell time comes.
This post has been edited by Piperdown: