QUOTE(Random832 @ Tue 26th February 2008, 8:06pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
QUOTE(One @ Tue 26th February 2008, 7:57pm)
![*](style_images/brack/post_snapback.gif)
I like how he knows they're forged before seeing them.
Because specific claims are being openly made about the contents, and he
of course absolutely
never wrote any e-mails for which such claims would be valid. The better question would be, if the claims are false and he never wrote any such emails, how would he know that the e-mails exist at all; wouldn't he be claiming they don't exist at all rather than that they're forged? That he's on the "they're forged" angle _before_ the e-mails are actually published tells us that he knows they exist.
actually, Gary knows they exist because according to his own blog, a reporter showed them (one? more?) to him.
and MM, pretending not to be Gary, despite IP/Varkala/Interests/Email evidence, supposedly has read Gary's blog to learn this.
So this line of reasoning that you guys are now trying to go at is off-target. there are so many more easier contradictions to point out though.
Just ban MM and his socks for abusive socking, you don't even have to pursue what we all know what Gary has been up to for 2 years, and everyone wins. The WP aspect of this is more just an embarrassment, there are a lot more larger concerns off-WP involved that WP and WP'ians shouldn't care about, and is beyond the scope of a classic sock case.
Off-WP will take care of your COI expose's for you, WP. Just get back to doing what the Durovas and Jehochmans of the WP are doing, and trying to wipe all traces of this off their reputations, lol.
Thatcher? not so much.
Enjoy this
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...&oldid=88023922This post has been edited by Piperdown: