I wrote an e-mail to Jack Stripling, who wrote the article for the Gainesville Sun (
http://www.gainesville.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...30326/1078/news ) that is the only source that claims to have evidence of a police inquiry. As part of that e-mail, I pointed out that indeed Daniel Brandt does not have an "ongoing dispute with Snowspinner", indeed that the two have never met and that Snowspinner is not mentioned on the Wikipedia Watch hivemind page (but is listed in his list of administrators). In the thread itself, Daniel Brandt was not the only person to suggest that there was a valid reason for the police to be called, and indeed that, given that we now know that the university had a 10-person mass murder a year earlier, which remains unsolved, then police very definitely should have been called. I mean, consider this - the post was made 18 months ago and by this stage if something was going to happen then it would have, so we can ignore it. But when we consider that just a few months after the post, a 10-person mass murder really did happen at the self same university, then it changes things dramatically. Someone at the university could well have known that and put two and two together to suggest it.
QUOTE(hades @ Sun 28th May 2006, 3:59am)
QUOTE(Hushthis @ Sat 27th May 2006, 11:01am)
About staff here altering posts, as long as the altered posts don't misrepresent my postings, that's their prerogative.
That's fine. I just wish they wouldn't call me a liar and accuse me of faking screenshots when I point out that the posts have been altered and deleted, like Selina and sgrayban did. Can we at least agree that posts in this thread were altered by someone other than their authors, and that I'm not making it up?
I am not sure that they were altered by someone other than their authors. People can edit their own posts here.