QUOTE(badlydrawnjeff @ Tue 18th March 2008, 12:23pm)
Can someone coherently explain to me why someone who appears to have some pretty heady producing creidts to his name wouldn't belong in Wikipedia?
Because when his biography was vandalized calling him a gay paedophile etc, he was so un-notable
he had to remove the slurs himself?Can someone coherently explain why someone would publish an "encyclopedia biography" of someone that contained blatant defamatory statements , and somehow not expect to get sued?
Can someone coherently explain why a forum that disallows WP:Original Research and WP:SYNTH still allows someone to create a biography on a subject that has never before appeared in an encyclopedia, and whose bio is even absent from the otherwise exhaustive film almanac AllMovieGuide?
WP:OPT OUT
WP:NO ORIGINAL BIOGRAPHIES
WP:WHY ARE THESE TWO NECESSARY PREMISES SO HARD FOR YOU PEOPLE TO ADOPT?