This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.
Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined:
Member No.: 767
Wikipedia has proved itself incapable of hosting an article on Don Murphy, by allowing for gross vandalism that the subject had to remove himself a year ago.
"Public figures" do not generally expect to have to correct such details themselves, nor appear on a site like this arguing their case.
The latest activities by anonymous, unaccountable individuals on the Don Murphy article are deliberate designed to goad the subject.
Wikipedia has failed to address these new activities, even letting these obvious cheats converse in the discussion about the article.
Hence Wikipedia continues to show the same irresponsible disdain for BLP victims over two years after the Siegenthaler affair.