QUOTE(ColScott @ Tue 18th March 2008, 3:34am)
why does SPA RTFA get to vote and do whatever he wants but SPA TOOMANYTOOLS does not?
This may be old news by now (a few days ago), but take a look at some of the language ArbCom-approved sockpuppet RTFA was pushing:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=198746972QUOTE
“He is seen as a producer who, while hard to work with, has a drive to get results.â€
“He is seen as…†Pet the weasels. Touch them. Love them.
QUOTE
“He was attached as a producer to the 2007 big-budget film Transformers, though he was criticized by the studios for using his personal website as a vehicle for Transformers fans to discuss the film, which had numerous negative postings.â€
This time we have a subject of sorts, “the studios.†Is this really so important that it needs to be in the lead?
No wonder Murphy doesn’t want his bio on Wikipedia: even when it’s good, it’s bad. If a reader walked away knowing nothing else about Murphy, it might easily have been that “he is seen…as hard to work with.†That’s the function of a introduction, after all. It takes no imagination at all to see how this could damage him.
User:John Reaves blocks Runabrat, who’d was pushing for a far more reasonable version against RTFA’s hit piece, as a “disruptive SPA:â€
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...e=User:RunabratAs opposed to this ArbCom-approved sockpuppet:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...500&target=RTFAhttp://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=199013305ArbCom approved this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=198693177ArbCom approved this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=198722930This post has been edited by Proabivouac: