QUOTE(FLIPSIDE @ Tue 1st April 2008, 9:03am)
I have been to many Wikipedia review sites now, and am less than enthused with the endless ball-lessness and lukewarm debate over the ethics over ending Wikipedia Administrative Anonymity. Out of respect for the rules of Wikipedia Review, I am not posting the names here, but I will give you the link to my first dedicated Information Bomb against Wikipedia. It is now my official mission to ruin Anonymity on Wikipedia. If anyone has anything useful to contribute, consider yourselves invited to contact me. I am currently only impressed by the work of Daniel Brandt and Judd Bagley, and observe that the various forums "critical" of Wikipedia are excessively staffed by Wikipedia Admins, as evidenced by their blistering wails (Wales?) whenever solid information comes out.
To whatever end, I now offer you the new WIKIPEDIA USER DATABASE at Haters Magazine
http://www.contextflexed.com/storywikipediaexposed.htmlTsk. You didn't spell my name right. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/tongue.gif) And the bit, "helped kill Amorrow's account then Fake Retired" is completely bogus given, 1) Amorrow was banned before I was even sysop and 2) I never "fake retired" as I'd remained editing (and quite enjoying it) when I handed up my sysop and c/u bits. I'd intended to stay gone but got Hiveminded anyways (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/rolleyes.gif)
Oh and the me 'n' Foz cabal? lol! (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/biggrin.gif)