FORUM WARNING [2] Division by zero (Line: 2933 of /srcsgcaop/boardclass.php)
Wikileaks -
     
 
The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Wikileaks, not really a wiki?
thekohser
post
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



I've finally taken some time to look into Wikileaks.org -- and boy, does it take some time to look into, thanks to page-loading speeds that would make a tortoise proud.

I don't see any mechanism for registering an account with the site, and therefore, I wonder whether there is any "community" editing going on. It appears that there is, but there's no "edit" function. So, are the various IPs that are editing Wikileaks all "insider" accounts that have been granted access to the edit button? I don't quite get it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
Replies
NuclearWarfare
post
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 382
Joined:
Member No.: 9,506



http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Special:RecentChanges does not exist. Indeed, their draft FAQ page says "WikiLeaks integrates technologies including modified versions of MediaWiki, OpenSSL, FreeNet, Tor, PGP and software of our own design." I am not sure who updates the front page of the site or the articles that are released , but I would assume that it would be Julian Assange (T-H-L-K-D) or part of his staff.

What IPs have you seen editing the site?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post
Post #3


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined:
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(NuclearWarfare @ Tue 27th July 2010, 11:26am) *

What IPs have you seen editing the site?

I guess I just noticed this one, 1.0.22.53.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post
Post #4


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,222
Joined:
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670



QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 27th July 2010, 12:30pm) *
QUOTE(NuclearWarfare @ Tue 27th July 2010, 11:26am) *
What IPs have you seen editing the site?
I guess I just noticed this one, 1.0.22.53.

Network 1.0.0.0/8 ?!? Really?!?

That has to be DARPA itself. I have never seen Network 1.0.0.0/8 before.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NuclearWarfare
post
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 382
Joined:
Member No.: 9,506



QUOTE(Moulton @ Tue 27th July 2010, 5:28pm) *

QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 27th July 2010, 12:30pm) *
QUOTE(NuclearWarfare @ Tue 27th July 2010, 11:26am) *
What IPs have you seen editing the site?
I guess I just noticed this one, 1.0.22.53.

Network 1.0.0.0/8 ?!? Really?!?

That has to be DARPA itself. I have never seen Network 1.0.0.0/8 before.


Interestingly, a userpage exists for that IP (http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/User:1.0.22.53), but a contributions page does not (http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Special:Cont...tions/1.0.22.53).

The userpage includes an interesting note: "This is an anonymous address that does not belong to any single user. 1.0.22.53 22:43, 14 November 2007 (GMT)" I wonder how and why it was done that way. I also wonder how the IP managed to post to http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Talk:Wikileaks at all, there is no edit button besides "view source" when logged out ( as opposed to logged in, which like Greg I am unsure how to do)

This post has been edited by NuclearWarfare:
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post
Post #6


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,222
Joined:
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670



QUOTE(NuclearWarfare @ Tue 27th July 2010, 2:16pm) *
QUOTE(Moulton @ Tue 27th July 2010, 5:28pm) *
QUOTE(thekohser @ Tue 27th July 2010, 12:30pm) *
QUOTE(NuclearWarfare @ Tue 27th July 2010, 11:26am) *
What IPs have you seen editing the site?
I guess I just noticed this one, 1.0.22.53.
Network 1.0.0.0/8 ?!? Really?!?

That has to be DARPA itself. I have never seen Network 1.0.0.0/8 before.
Interestingly, a userpage exists for that IP (http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/User:1.0.22.53), but a contributions page does not (http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Special:Cont...tions/1.0.22.53).

The userpage includes an interesting note: "This is an anonymous address that does not belong to any single user. 1.0.22.53 22:43, 14 November 2007 (GMT)"

OK. Network 1.0.0.0/8 evidently does belong to IANA (The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) which administers the Internet.

QUOTE(WHOIS 1.0.22.53)
$ whois 1.0.22.53

OrgName: Internet Assigned Numbers Authority
OrgID: IANA
Address: 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330
City: Marina del Rey
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 90292-6695
Country: US

NetRange: 1.0.0.0 - 1.255.255.255
CIDR: 1.0.0.0/8

Most likely, that address was edited into the page to make it clear that the real IP is anonymous. It's exceedingly unlikely that anyone at IANA is really editing WikiLeaks.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
tarantino
post
Post #7


the Dude abides
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,441
Joined:
Member No.: 2,143



QUOTE(Moulton @ Tue 27th July 2010, 7:21pm) *


OK. Network 1.0.0.0/8 evidently does belong to IANA (The Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) which administers the Internet.


It was recently allocated to APNIC.

A few IPs have edited WP from that range over the years, for example 1.1.1.227.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=118261241
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=126207619

It's odd that Special:Contributions/1.1.1.227 only shows one of those edits.

This edit by 1.2.3.4 looks like Kate playing around.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
thekohser   Wikileaks  
Eva Destruction   I've finally taken some time to look into Wik...  
GlassBeadGame   [quote name='thekohser' post='245526' date='Tue 2...  
thekohser   I wonder if each of 90,000 pages was really revie...  
CharlotteWebb   The userpage includes an interesting note: ...  
CharlotteWebb   [url=http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Special:Recent...  
thekohser   This "Writer's Kit" page seems inter...  
GlassBeadGame   A couple of interesting things from their Submissi...  
GlassBeadGame   Mod Note: Why is this in MediaWiki Software? I ...  
thekohser   Mod Note: Why is this in MediaWiki Software? I...  
GlassBeadGame   Mod Note: Why is this in MediaWiki Software? ...  
Theanima   It is definitely a wiki, just not one that we...  
Zoloft   It's a wiki, because of the software, but conf...  
cookiehead   This is going to make the Pentagon Papers seem lik...  
Moulton   I don't know if you've been listening to N...  
GlassBeadGame   Per NPR this morning: The Obama administration has...  
GlassBeadGame   The Wikileaks war dump has now spurred discussion ...  
GlassBeadGame   Per NPR this morning: The administration is askin...  
NuclearWarfare   Per NPR this morning: The administration is aski...  
GlassBeadGame   Per NPR this morning: The administration is ask...  
NuclearWarfare   I might be giving WL too much credit but my take o...  
CharlotteWebb   What was this state document? Wikileaks does have...  
thekohser   What was this state document? Wikileaks does hav...  
thekohser   A state document that was made available to me, wh...  
Ottava   Out of all the hoopla and the rest, am I the only ...  
Somey   Just the image of him shuts off my brain's abi...  
Jon Awbrey   Just the image of him shuts off my brain's a...  


Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now:
 
     
FORUM WARNING [2] Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/wikipede/public_html/int042kj398.php:242) (Line: 0 of Unknown)