 More paid editing |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Garbage Skow |
Post
#1
|
|
Neophyte Group: Members Posts: 4 Joined: From: Illinois Member No.: 36,073  |
So a "new" editor pops up and... surprise, happens to be a decent writer. Actually contributing content.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Adm...for_Jill_Kenton So what's the problem? Well, for one thing they were called out with some pretty good evidence but still lied about who they were. Also they're being accused of socking (not sure if I believe that or not). So, what say you? If a sock, then whose sock? And will Wikipedia ever come up with a progressive policy towards paid editors? |
   |
 
|
  |
Replies
| Somey |
Post
#2
|
|
Can't actually moderate (or even post)  Group: Moderators Posts: 11,816 Joined: From: Dreamland Member No.: 275 |
QUOTE(The Garbage Skow @ Wed 11th April 2012, 11:30pm)  So, what say you? If a sock, then whose sock? It's not someone we're familiar with on WR, so we'll probably never find out. Nobody connected with this site would have used nearly 30 separate revisions to "polish" that article - anybody here would have known that you have to do it in one revision, two at the most. If "LarEvee" had done that, nobody would have noticed a thing, and he'd be free and clear. QUOTE And will Wikipedia ever come up with a progressive policy towards paid editors? No. |
|
|
|
Posts in this topic
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: |