The Joe H. challenge to Goethean Options Rating

[victim of censorship]

=Hello pathetic and cowardly little man=
AKA...Goethean (T-C-L-K-R-D)
As you know where I live, I know were you live as well, so I have committed to confined my augments with you to this cesspool and Wikpeidia Review so as not to have it spill out in the street and I hope you do the same.

Make no mistake, I have ABSOLUTELY no respect for your beliefs and methods of intellectual thuggery, bullying... You're a little man, pathetic and cowardly - intellectual, spiritual, and morally corrupt...your shameful ways of gaming Wikirulez, and other equally low games, in order to foist your rotten and flawed point of view, is reflective of your ethics I have seen on wikipeidia for years now. What is sad is no one calls you to task, with out getting wacked by your admin friends.

Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make you a challenge, assuming you are brave enough and so sure of your beliefs, to crawl out from this dark and dank hiding place and on to Wikireview (a venue where you can't call an admin with tools, where you have to stand toe to toe on the merit of your augments and defend your sorry self, to the charges I make there, that your new age beliefs are garbage, and Ramakrishna's is just power mad homo erotic addict and your a sorry little thuggish boor.

Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a coward, then I await your presence at Wikipedia Review so you can tell me and the, world at large, why your so right and the world is so wrong. MAN UP or hid like the weak bully boy you are.???

Any rate I be waiting for you there.

JoE

Addendum:
Looks like Goathed is crying to his little owl face turkey.. ...Tiptoety (T-C-L-K-R-D) ....
MAN UP GOETHEAN COME HERE AND SHOW WHY YOUR RIGHT!!

This is how Goethean "Mans up" with the help of his lacky wikiadmin buddy Acroterion

This post has been edited by victim of censorship: Sun 17th October 2010, 10:54pm

[Alison]

Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make you a challenge, assuming you are brave enough and so sure of your beliefs, to crawl out from this dark and dank hiding place and on to Wikireview (a venue where you can't call an admin with tools, where you have to stand toe to toe on the merit of your augments and defend your sorry self, to the charges I make there, that your new age beliefs are garbage, and Ramakrishna's is just power mad homo erotic addict and your a sorry little thuggish boor.

Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a coward, then I await your presence at Wikipedia Review so you can tell me and the, world at large, why your so right and the world is so wrong. MAN UP or hid like the weak bully boy you are.???

Any rate I be waiting for you there.

JoE

I think it would be interesting and more than a little lulzy, if Goethean showed up here and you guys got talking. However I don't think either of you would get much resolved at the end of the day & I can see you getting more and more irate while Goethean BAWWWed to the mods to have you banned from WR (and failing ) Then he'd go off saying he challenged you on your own turf or whatev, while you would be saying that he ran off like a snivelling coward.

Then the next day, it would be back to business on WP for both of you

[Jon Awbrey]

Reader Advisory : Plot Spoiler Ahead —

I think it would be interesting and more than a little lulzy, if Goethean showed up here and you guys got talking. However I don't think either of you would get much resolved at the end of the day & I can see you getting more and more irate while Goethean BAWWWed to the mods to have you banned from WR (and failing ) Then he'd go off saying he challenged you on your own turf or whatev, while you would be saying that he ran off like a snivelling coward.

Then the next day, it would be back to business on WP for both of you

[victim of censorship]

Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make you a challenge, assuming you are brave enough and so sure of your beliefs, to crawl out from this dark and dank hiding place and on to Wikireview (a venue where you can't call an admin with tools, where you have to stand toe to toe on the merit of your augments and defend your sorry self, to the charges I make there, that your new age beliefs are garbage, and Ramakrishna's is just power mad homo erotic addict and your a sorry little thuggish boor.

Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a coward, then I await your presence at Wikipedia Review so you can tell me and the, world at large, why your so right and the world is so wrong. MAN UP or hid like the weak bully boy you are.???

Any rate I be waiting for you there.

JoE

I think it would be interesting and more than a little lulzy, if Goethean showed up here and you guys got talking. However I don't think either of you would get much resolved at the end of the day & I can see you getting more and more irate while Goethean BAWWWed to the mods to have you banned from WR (and failing ) Then he'd go off saying he challenged you on your own turf or whatev, while you would be saying that he ran off like a snivelling coward.

Then the next day, it would be back to business on WP for both of you

This little man is a coward. plain and simple.

[EricBarbour]

Reader Advisory : Plot Spoiler Ahead —

If this is a "plot", somebody please shoot the author.
Because his writing sucks.

This post has been edited by EricBarbour: Mon 18th October 2010, 3:21am

[Tarc]

=Hello pathetic and cowardly little man=
AKA...Goethean (T-C-L-K-R-D)
As you know where I live, I know were you live as well, so I have committed to confined my augments with you to this cesspool and Wikpeidia Review so as not to have it spill out in the street and I hope you do the same.

Make no mistake, I have ABSOLUTELY no respect for your beliefs and methods of intellectual thuggery, bullying... You're a little man, pathetic and cowardly - intellectual, spiritual, and morally corrupt...your shameful ways of gaming Wikirulez, and other equally low games, in order to foist your rotten and flawed point of view, is reflective of your ethics I have seen on wikipeidia for years now. What is sad is no one calls you to task, with out getting wacked by your admin friends.

Now if you like to hide here, fine, but I make you a challenge, assuming you are brave enough and so sure of your beliefs, to crawl out from this dark and dank hiding place and on to Wikireview (a venue where you can't call an admin with tools, where you have to stand toe to toe on the merit of your augments and defend your sorry self, to the charges I make there, that your new age beliefs are garbage, and Ramakrishna's is just power mad homo erotic addict and your a sorry little thuggish boor.

Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a coward, then I await your presence at Wikipedia Review so you can tell me and the, world at large, why your so right and the world is so wrong. MAN UP or hid like the weak bully boy you are.???

Any rate I be waiting for you there.

JoE

Addendum:
Looks like Goathed is crying to his little owl face turkey.. ...Tiptoety (T-C-L-K-R-D) ....
MAN UP GOETHEAN COME HERE AND SHOW WHY YOUR RIGHT!!

This is how Goethean "Mans up" with the help of his lacky wikiadmin buddy Acroterion

[Somey]

Hmm. Apparently what happened this time was, AnonIP 67.250.120.197 tried to add some "external links" to the article on Deborah Burlingame (T-H-L-K-D), who apparently is some sort of conservative 9/11 victims' advocate. Goethean reverted that, claiming that 67.250.120.197 was a "Joehazelton sock" and altering the relevant "SPI" page to reflect this claim. 67.250.120.197 may or may not be Mr. Victim (I'd guess not, since he's never posted here on WR from 67-anything), but in any event, Goathead then went on to accuse Spaceysrockets (T-C-L-K-R-D) of being "Joehazelton" as well, when Spaceysrockets voted to delete one of Goathead's pet articles on one of his new-age pals, Dawn Covington (T-H-L-K-D), and also tried to re-insert some criticism of another one of Goathead's pals, George Berkeley. Both 67.250.120.197 and Spaceysrockets were blocked, apparently at Goathead's behest.

My guess is that Spaceysrockets probably was Mr. Victim, who in turn was alerted to the 67.250.120.197 situation by the change to the SPI page. But he did nothing with the account that was actually "blockworthy" - I understand that they block Mr. Victim's known IP addresses pretty much reflexively, but I don't see anything that would even have warranted a CheckUser on that account. So, my conclusion is that both blocks were abusive.

Why don't they just make Goathead an admin/bureaucrat/checkuser/steward, if they're just going to do whatever he wants them to? It would save time... it looks like they don't even bother to check these things, they just do whatever he says. Meanwhile, he continues to spam WP with BS about these marginal new-age guru-types whom nobody has ever heard of (and, I suspect, deservedly so).

[A Horse With No Name]

Again, if you should MAN UP instead of being a coward, then I await your presence at Wikipedia Review so you can tell me and the, world at large, why your so right and the world is so wrong. MAN UP or hid like the weak bully boy you are.???

Voc is really Sharron Angle?

[victim of censorship]

Hmm. Apparently what happened this time was, AnonIP 67.250.120.197 tried to add some "external links" to the article on Deborah Burlingame (T-H-L-K-D), who apparently is some sort of conservative 9/11 victims' advocate. Goethean reverted that, claiming that 67.250.120.197 was a "Joehazelton sock" and altering the relevant "SPI" page to reflect this claim. 67.250.120.197 may or may not be Mr. Victim (I'd guess not, since he's never posted here on WR from 67-anything), but in any event, Goathead then went on to accuse Spaceysrockets (T-C-L-K-R-D) of being "Joehazelton" as well, when Spaceysrockets voted to delete one of Goathead's pet articles on one of his new-age pals, Dawn Covington (T-H-L-K-D), and also tried to re-insert some criticism of another one of Goathead's pals, George Berkeley. Both 67.250.120.197 and Spaceysrockets were blocked, apparently at Goathead's behest.

My guess is that Spaceysrockets probably was Mr. Victim, who in turn was alerted to the 67.250.120.197 situation by the change to the SPI page. But he did nothing with the account that was actually "blockworthy" - I understand that they block Mr. Victim's known IP addresses pretty much reflexively, but I don't see anything that would even have warranted a CheckUser on that account. So, my conclusion is that both blocks were abusive.

Why don't they just make Goathead an admin/bureaucrat/checkuser/steward, if they're just going to do whatever he wants them to? It would save time... it looks like they don't even bother to check these things, they just do whatever he says. Meanwhile, he continues to spam WP with BS about these marginal new-age guru-types whom nobody has ever heard of (and, I suspect, deservedly so).

I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of the admins, like MuZemike (T-C-L-K-R-D) .

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

This post has been edited by victim of censorship: Tue 19th October 2010, 12:57am

[A Horse With No Name]

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

Why? What would you do to them?

[Alison]

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

Why? What would you do to them?

Give 'em a big ol' wedgie, I suspect

[victim of censorship]

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

Why? What would you do to them?

Give 'em a big ol' wedgie, I suspect

TO BAD you ENABLE GOETHEAN's abuse... so I have no respect.

[Alison]

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

Why? What would you do to them?

Give 'em a big ol' wedgie, I suspect

TO BAD you ENABLE GOETHEAN's abuse... so I have no respect.

TOO BAD you Use RanDoM cAPs ... .. so I have no reshpekt.

[Milton Roe]

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

Why? What would you do to them?

Give 'em a big ol' wedgie, I suspect

I wonder if this will this make it through Ottava's child-porn filter?

[TungstenCarbide]

I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of the admins, like MuZemike (T-C-L-K-R-D) .

I've never made more than a handful of edits per month, most of them unproblematic, yet MuZemike just blocked tens of thousands of IP addresses because of littl'ol me. I win.

I'm usually too lazy to proxy in, but I just might spend the 4 minutes it takes to go there and gloat.

This post has been edited by TungstenCarbide: Tue 19th October 2010, 1:51am

[Milton Roe]

I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of the admins, like MuZemike (T-C-L-K-R-D) .

I've never made more than a handful of edits per month, most of them unproblematic, yet MuZemike just blocked tens of thousands of IP addresses because of littl'ol me. I win.

I'm usually too lazy to proxy in, but I just might spend the 4 minutes it takes to go there and gloat.

Speaking of wedgies, what has Durova's iron panties in a vice-grip twist?. If she worked that hard finding WMF and Wales COI issues, she'd be banniated to Kohs Hell by now.

[Somey]

I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of the admins, like MuZemike (T-C-L-K-R-D) .

Well, some people will provide oral sex to just about anybody. But without more details about his personal life, we can't really say if he actually likes it or not...

This doesn't answer the question at hand, though, which is whether or not you (i.e., Mr. Victim) were the person behind the AnonIP 67.250.120.197 and/or User:Spaceysrockets. Also, we need a special term to describe these Goethean vs. Mr. Victim threads... something like "another Joeblock" or, if you like allusions to German philosophy, "another German philosophers suck thread."

[Milton Roe]

This doesn't answer the question at hand, though, which is whether or not you (i.e., Mr. Victim) were the person behind the AnonIP 67.250.120.197 and/or User:Spaceysrockets. Also, we need a special term to describe these Goethean vs. Mr. Victim threads... something like "another Joeblock" or, if you like allusions to German philosophy, "another German philosophers suck thread."

Oh nooos, not the Randroid shit again!

HK, you know that when LaRouche dies and goes to Hell, they're going to put him in a double-cell with Ms. Rand, replacing Kant. Due to the special properties of Hell, the implied matter-antimatter reaction will be forever suppressed.

[victim of censorship]

I bet Goathead loves to suck the dicks of some of the admins, like MuZemike (T-C-L-K-R-D) .

Well, some people will provide oral sex to just about anybody. But without more details about his personal life, we can't really say if he actually likes it or not...

This doesn't answer the question at hand, though, which is whether or not you (i.e., Mr. Victim) were the person behind the AnonIP 67.250.120.197 and/or User:Spaceysrockets. Also, we need a special term to describe these Goethean vs. Mr. Victim threads... something like "another Joeblock" or, if you like allusions to German philosophy, "another German philosophers suck thread."

To answer your question about 67.250.120.197, that answer is no, that was not me.

Now I have a question for Alison?...Why is Goethean allowed to to run like a wild feral animal on Wikipedia and be the abusive jackass he is???

This is why I spit on Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Goathed and the rest of the despicable jagoffs that admin Wikipedia .... god help them if their paths ever cross mine in real life.

Why? What would you do to them?

Give 'em a big ol' wedgie, I suspect

TO BAD you ENABLE GOETHEAN's abuse... so I have no respect.

TOO BAD you Use RanDoM cAPs ... .. so I have no reshpekt.

To bad you don't ban Goethean

[Alison]

Now I have a question for Alison?...Why is Goethean allowed to to run like a wild feral animal on Wikipedia and be the abusive jackass he is???

[...]

To bad you don't ban Goethean

For what? Being a dick? There wouldn't be many editors left if bannination was being handed out for that. What has he specifically done that requires admin action? Seriously - I've not really followed the whole Goethean thing (largely because of your own attitude, to be honest, and the fact that I'm trying to disconnect from WP) - at least point me to some *genuine* misdeeds here. Yes, he constantly cries to admins to have your many, many socks banned - and some that clearly aren't yours - I've stepped in before over other innocent editors, as well you know. Oh, and he's got some New Age bee in his bonnet

But other than that, and your personalized campaign against him - what exactly is there?? Help me out here.