QUOTE(Alex @ Wed 25th March 2009, 12:46am)
Well as I said in my statement, he's been a problem since the beginning, and should never have even been made an admin.
Funnily enough, Ryulong 3 was the first RfA I ever participated in (support). I've often speculated that, had Ryulong gone on to have a fourth RfA (rather than had the third closed at 68% as successful), it's possible that the RfCs and the current arbitration case now opened regarding his tool use and conduct wouldn't be happening, as he would have taken on board what would have led to RfA#3 being unsuccessful, and would be a much better administrator. Unfortunately, we won't know. (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/unhappy.gif) I dunno...maybe I'm being too generous here.
For the record, does anyone remember what Raul654's rationale for closing that RfA as successful was?
Ryulong might be going to arbitration
