The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

6 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> banned means banned, Don't they understand how sick they really are?
mbz1
post Mon 27th February 2012, 9:02pm
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(AGK @ Mon 27th February 2012, 7:20pm) *


By the by, I may be a sitting arbitrator, but I was inactive on the TimidGuy case and I played no part in the decision-making process for the case.

Does it change anything?

This post has been edited by mbz1: Mon 27th February 2012, 10:53pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Mon 27th February 2012, 9:10pm
Post #22


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(AGK @ Mon 27th February 2012, 7:20pm) *

My objection in this case was to the use of an invented barnstar gallery. The banned template was not replaced or added above Will Beback's previous userpage.

I see you circumvented your English Wikipedia block by adding a message on my Meta talk page. Please stop using other Wikimedia websites to participate in Wikipedia, at least until you're willing to act in that project's benefit.

By the by, I may be a sitting arbitrator, but I was inactive on the TimidGuy case and I played no part in the decision-making process for the case.


You haven't answered his question. His question wasn't why in this particular case. The question is why you engage in this barbaric practice in general. I'm tempted to say 'medieval' but medieval society was somewhat more civilised than Wikipedia, so I won't.

This post has been edited by Peter Damian: Mon 27th February 2012, 9:13pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post Mon 27th February 2012, 9:31pm
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 27th February 2012, 9:10pm) *

QUOTE(AGK @ Mon 27th February 2012, 7:20pm) *

My objection in this case was to the use of an invented barnstar gallery. The banned template was not replaced or added above Will Beback's previous userpage.

I see you circumvented your English Wikipedia block by adding a message on my Meta talk page. Please stop using other Wikimedia websites to participate in Wikipedia, at least until you're willing to act in that project's benefit.

By the by, I may be a sitting arbitrator, but I was inactive on the TimidGuy case and I played no part in the decision-making process for the case.


You haven't answered his question. His question wasn't why in this particular case. The question is why you engage in this barbaric practice in general. I'm tempted to say 'medieval' but medieval society was somewhat more civilised than Wikipedia, so I won't.

It is a punishment by shame, something like this:

Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Mon 27th February 2012, 9:34pm
Post #24


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Mon 27th February 2012, 9:31pm) *

It is a punishment by shame, something like this:


As though not just the one enacting the ban, but everyone in the community must participate in the shaming of the one cast out, the common participation in his or her public humiliation justifying their action and cementing their self-solidarity.

I think this has all been said before many time by sociologists, historians, anthropologists etc.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lilburne
post Mon 27th February 2012, 9:38pm
Post #25


Chameleon
*****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 890
Joined: Thu 17th Jun 2010, 11:42am
Member No.: 21,803

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Has any one danced around WBB's latest talk page comments and striking them out?

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jd turk
post Mon 27th February 2012, 9:47pm
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon 5th May 2008, 12:56am
Member No.: 5,976



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Mon 27th February 2012, 3:31pm) *

It is a punishment by shame...


I just don't see where the shame is, especially with someone like Mbz1 who claims to take so much pleasure and personal pride in being banned from Wikipedia.

Everyone who is banned has been so for long-term disagreements. No actual contributor gets banned straight off, there's a pattern there of conflict over a sustained period of time. If a user is determined to stick to their guns and fight for what they consider to be correct, they do so while realizing that the truth doesn't always win out, especially in a social network like Wikipedia.

No shame involved with it, you just wind up winning back your free time.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post Mon 27th February 2012, 10:20pm
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(lilburne @ Mon 27th February 2012, 9:38pm) *

Has any one danced around WBB's latest talk page comments and striking them out?

I do not think so. BTW Will got a special barnstar :-)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mbz1
post Mon 27th February 2012, 10:24pm
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 461
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 10:50pm
Member No.: 25,791



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Mon 27th February 2012, 9:34pm) *

QUOTE(mbz1 @ Mon 27th February 2012, 9:31pm) *

It is a punishment by shame, something like this:


As though not just the one enacting the ban, but everyone in the community must participate in the shaming of the one cast out, the common participation in his or her public humiliation justifying their action and cementing their self-solidarity.


That's it. Thanks, Peter!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Malik Shabazz
post Mon 27th February 2012, 10:52pm
Post #29


Junior Member
**

Group: Contributors
Posts: 76
Joined: Tue 24th Aug 2010, 5:17pm
From: God bless Chocolate City and its vanilla suburbs
Member No.: 25,765

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Mon 27th February 2012, 4:02pm) *

QUOTE(Wikifan @ Mon 27th February 2012, 8:52pm) *

people hate you mbz1.

why almost every time you open your mouth, you say something stupid?

Will somebody get these two a room?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
lonza leggiera
post Mon 27th February 2012, 10:58pm
Post #30


New Member
*

Group: Contributors
Posts: 44
Joined: Sat 17th Jul 2010, 2:12pm
Member No.: 23,009



QUOTE(mbz1 @ Tue 28th February 2012, 6:51am) *

QUOTE(lilburne @ Mon 27th February 2012, 7:43pm) *

QUOTE(AGK @ Mon 27th February 2012, 7:20pm) *

QUOTE(mbz1 @ Mon 27th February 2012, 6:35pm) *

A few days ago I told my friend that, when a user is banned from wikipedia, his user page is replaced with banned user template. She looked at me, and asked "why?" I was not able to explain to her "why" because a normal person will never be able to understand it anyway.

Even before I was banned, I observed how a "little shit" Daedalus969 (T-C-L-K-R-D) and other "little shits" were doing this, but today a sitting arbitrator AGK (T-C-L-K-R-D) did it too:
"banned means banned; barnstars, and his actual userpage, are in the history"
Why, AGK, did you do it? What is wrong, if below the banned user template there would be barnstars? What are you afraid of? Don't you understand how sick it looks to normal people?

And suddenly I realized that "the banned user template" is the only thing I'd like to be associated with me in the insane asylum that calls "wikipedia" http://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?titl...0&oldid=3513926.


By the by, I may be a sitting arbitrator, but I was inactive on the TimidGuy case and I played no part in the decision-making process for the case.


English isn't Mbz1's firsty language and I think that 'sitting' is a spelling mistake.

Thanks for catching it. What should it be?

I think this is a subtle joke on Lilburne's part. I believe he's suggesting that you might've omitted a 'h'.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
iii
post Mon 27th February 2012, 11:14pm
Post #31


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 114
Joined: Wed 19th Jan 2011, 12:39am
Member No.: 38,992



QUOTE(AGK @ Mon 27th February 2012, 2:20pm) *

I see you circumvented your English Wikipedia block by adding a message on my Meta talk page. Please stop using other Wikimedia websites to participate in Wikipedia, at least until you're willing to act in that project's benefit.


Listen here, you sanctimonious little fuck: Who the flying fuck do you think you are telling another human being you've never met how they are or are not willing to act? Here, let me try to divine how you're "willing to act":

You have no empathy for human beings and generally have a hard time interacting with them in the real world so you are "willing to act" as an arrogant piece of shit proclaiming with certainty and idiotic self-assurance what the motivations are of any and all doubleplusungood nonpersons that you come across. Beyond your basement dwelling jack-off sessions playing Wikipedia, you have nothing to live for, and that causes you intense anxiety and an extreme "will to act" as a self-appointed guardian of the cult of which you're so happy to be a part. You're "willing to act" like a total schmuck because you think that your hard-fought attrition into some obscure cadre called the "Arbitration Committee" gives you a great responsibility as some Great Person on a popular internet site.

Well, you know what? You're nothing.

FUCK YOU.

If any member of the human race wants to use the perfectly legal means of fucking with Wikipedia because that website keeps more open doors and security holes in place than almost anywhere else of the world wide web, I encourage them to do so, if only to waste more of your miserable life's time so that we can ensure you'll stay locked in your basement and won't interact with the real world.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RMHED
post Mon 27th February 2012, 11:19pm
Post #32


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri 8th May 2009, 8:48pm
Member No.: 11,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(iii @ Mon 27th February 2012, 11:14pm) *


Listen here, you sanctimonious little fuck: Who the flying fuck do you think... (extended diatribe redacted)

Mmmmm, I'm sensing some anger management issues here.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jayvdb
post Mon 27th February 2012, 11:43pm
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 271
Joined: Wed 28th Feb 2007, 2:15am
From: Melbourne, Australia
Member No.: 1,039

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(radek @ Mon 27th February 2012, 8:07pm) *

I actually hate that practice of putting those templates on user's pages. It is very unsavory. And in some cases (not nec this one) the glee with which people jump to slap it up there is plain ol' disgusting.

I think a note at the top of the userpage is useful, but the notice could be a lot less aggressive than it currently is, and their previous webpage doesnt need to be removed in the process. Discussion about this has erupted at Wikipedia_talk:BAN#User_pages.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
SB_Johnny
post Tue 28th February 2012, 12:02am
Post #34


It wasn't me who made honky-tonk angels
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 2,128
Joined: Mon 15th Sep 2008, 3:10pm
Member No.: 8,272

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(iii @ Mon 27th February 2012, 6:14pm) *

Listen here, you sanctimonious little fuck: Who the flying fuck do you think you are telling another human being you've never met how they are or are not willing to act? Here, let me try to divine how you're "willing to act":

You have no empathy for human beings and generally have a hard time interacting with them in the real world so you are "willing to act" as an arrogant piece of shit proclaiming with certainty and idiotic self-assurance what the motivations are of any and all doubleplusungood nonpersons that you come across. Beyond your basement dwelling jack-off sessions playing Wikipedia, you have nothing to live for, and that causes you intense anxiety and an extreme "will to act" as a self-appointed guardian of the cult of which you're so happy to be a part. You're "willing to act" like a total schmuck because you think that your hard-fought attrition into some obscure cadre called the "Arbitration Committee" gives you a great responsibility as some Great Person on a popular internet site.

Well, you know what? You're nothing.

FUCK YOU.

If any member of the human race wants to use the perfectly legal means of fucking with Wikipedia because that website keeps more open doors and security holes in place than almost anywhere else of the world wide web, I encourage them to do so, if only to waste more of your miserable life's time so that we can ensure you'll stay locked in your basement and won't interact with the real world.

Wow. Welcome back to WR, Mr. AGK! laugh.gif

QUOTE(RMHED @ Mon 27th February 2012, 6:19pm) *
Mmmmm, I'm sensing some anger management issues here.

Ya think???
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tarc
post Tue 28th February 2012, 12:43am
Post #35


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 976
Joined: Fri 7th Mar 2008, 3:38am
Member No.: 5,309

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(iii @ Mon 27th February 2012, 6:14pm) *

QUOTE(AGK @ Mon 27th February 2012, 2:20pm) *

I see you circumvented your English Wikipedia block by adding a message on my Meta talk page. Please stop using other Wikimedia websites to participate in Wikipedia, at least until you're willing to act in that project's benefit.


Listen here, you sanctimonious little fuck: Who the flying fuck do you think you are telling another human being you've never met how they are or are not willing to act? Here, let me try to divine how you're "willing to act":

You have no empathy for human beings and generally have a hard time interacting with them in the real world so you are "willing to act" as an arrogant piece of shit proclaiming with certainty and idiotic self-assurance what the motivations are of any and all doubleplusungood nonpersons that you come across. Beyond your basement dwelling jack-off sessions playing Wikipedia, you have nothing to live for, and that causes you intense anxiety and an extreme "will to act" as a self-appointed guardian of the cult of which you're so happy to be a part. You're "willing to act" like a total schmuck because you think that your hard-fought attrition into some obscure cadre called the "Arbitration Committee" gives you a great responsibility as some Great Person on a popular internet site.

Well, you know what? You're nothing.

FUCK YOU.

If any member of the human race wants to use the perfectly legal means of fucking with Wikipedia because that website keeps more open doors and security holes in place than almost anywhere else of the world wide web, I encourage them to do so, if only to waste more of your miserable life's time so that we can ensure you'll stay locked in your basement and won't interact with the real world.


I encourage such people to slit their wrists and save us from having to listen to their pedantic emo retardation. I will also point out that most movies with wrist-slitting do it completely wrong by showing the wound going across the wrist, when in reality you need to go up and down (i.e. inner-elbow-to-wrist) to get the preferred (i.e. dead) good result.

I am no fan of Wikipedia governance, but sometimes they do get it right; Mbz's ban was in all ways, shapes and forms correct.

This is a pathetic wastrel who in another time and place would've been shipped off to the gulag without a second thought.

This post has been edited by Tarc: Tue 28th February 2012, 12:59am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RMHED
post Tue 28th February 2012, 1:05am
Post #36


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri 8th May 2009, 8:48pm
Member No.: 11,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Tarc @ Tue 28th February 2012, 12:43am) *

QUOTE(iii @ Mon 27th February 2012, 6:14pm) *

QUOTE(AGK @ Mon 27th February 2012, 2:20pm) *

I see you circumvented your English Wikipedia block by adding a message on my Meta talk page. Please stop using other Wikimedia websites to participate in Wikipedia, at least until you're willing to act in that project's benefit.


Listen here, you sanctimonious little fuck: Who the flying fuck do you think you are telling another human being you've never met how they are or are not willing to act? Here, let me try to divine how you're "willing to act":

You have no empathy for human beings and generally have a hard time interacting with them in the real world so you are "willing to act" as an arrogant piece of shit proclaiming with certainty and idiotic self-assurance what the motivations are of any and all doubleplusungood nonpersons that you come across. Beyond your basement dwelling jack-off sessions playing Wikipedia, you have nothing to live for, and that causes you intense anxiety and an extreme "will to act" as a self-appointed guardian of the cult of which you're so happy to be a part. You're "willing to act" like a total schmuck because you think that your hard-fought attrition into some obscure cadre called the "Arbitration Committee" gives you a great responsibility as some Great Person on a popular internet site.

Well, you know what? You're nothing.

FUCK YOU.

If any member of the human race wants to use the perfectly legal means of fucking with Wikipedia because that website keeps more open doors and security holes in place than almost anywhere else of the world wide web, I encourage them to do so, if only to waste more of your miserable life's time so that we can ensure you'll stay locked in your basement and won't interact with the real world.


I encourage such people to slit their wrists and save us from having to listen to their pedantic emo retardation. I will also point out that most movies with wrist-slitting do it completely wrong by showing the wound going across the wrist, when in reality you need to go up and down (i.e. inner-elbow-to-wrist) to get the preferred (i.e. dead) good result.

I am no fan of Wikipedia governance, but sometimes they do get it right; Mbz's ban was in all ways, shapes and forms correct.

This is a pathetic wastrel who in another time and place would've been shipped off to the gulag without a second thought.

I have a premonition that your children too will grow up to become "pathetic wastrels", with you as their father it really is inevitable.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
EricBarbour
post Tue 28th February 2012, 1:10am
Post #37


blah
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,919
Joined: Mon 25th Feb 2008, 2:31am
Member No.: 5,066

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(iii @ Mon 27th February 2012, 6:14pm) *
Listen here, you sanctimonious little fuck: Who the flying fuck do you think you are telling another human being you've never met how they are or are not willing to act? Here, let me try to divine how you're "willing to act":

You have no empathy for human beings and generally have a hard time interacting with them in the real world so you are "willing to act" as an arrogant piece of shit proclaiming with certainty and idiotic self-assurance what the motivations are of any and all doubleplusungood nonpersons that you come across. Beyond your basement dwelling jack-off sessions playing Wikipedia, you have nothing to live for, and that causes you intense anxiety and an extreme "will to act" as a self-appointed guardian of the cult of which you're so happy to be a part. You're "willing to act" like a total schmuck because you think that your hard-fought attrition into some obscure cadre called the "Arbitration Committee" gives you a great responsibility as some Great Person on a popular internet site.

Well, you know what? You're nothing.

FUCK YOU.

If any member of the human race wants to use the perfectly legal means of fucking with Wikipedia because that website keeps more open doors and security holes in place than almost anywhere else of the world wide web, I encourage them to do so, if only to waste more of your miserable life's time so that we can ensure you'll stay locked in your basement and won't interact with the real world.


Hear hear. biggrin.gif

Although I might point out that Young Mr. Kelly is such an arrogant little twat, any criticism of him or
his methods or actions is a waste of breath/typing. People have tried--nothing gets thru.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tarc
post Tue 28th February 2012, 1:16am
Post #38


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 976
Joined: Fri 7th Mar 2008, 3:38am
Member No.: 5,309

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(RMHED @ Mon 27th February 2012, 8:05pm) *
I have a premonition that your children too will grow up to become "pathetic wastrels", with you as their father it really is inevitable.


Ahh, the non sequitur, what the weak mind falls back when it has no other recourse.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
RMHED
post Tue 28th February 2012, 1:18am
Post #39


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri 8th May 2009, 8:48pm
Member No.: 11,716

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Tarc @ Tue 28th February 2012, 1:16am) *

QUOTE(RMHED @ Mon 27th February 2012, 8:05pm) *
I have a premonition that your children too will grow up to become "pathetic wastrels", with you as their father it really is inevitable.


Ahh, the non sequitur, what the weak mind falls back when it has no other recourse.

Quite so. I'm an arse.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cedric
post Tue 28th February 2012, 1:29am
Post #40


General Gato
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,648
Joined: Sun 11th Mar 2007, 5:58pm
From: God's Ain Country
Member No.: 1,116

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Tarc @ Mon 27th February 2012, 6:43pm) *

QUOTE(iii @ Mon 27th February 2012, 6:14pm) *

QUOTE(AGK @ Mon 27th February 2012, 2:20pm) *

I see you circumvented your English Wikipedia block by adding a message on my Meta talk page. Please stop using other Wikimedia websites to participate in Wikipedia, at least until you're willing to act in that project's benefit.


Listen here, you sanctimonious little fuck: Who the flying fuck do you think you are telling another human being you've never met how they are or are not willing to act? Here, let me try to divine how you're "willing to act":

You have no empathy for human beings and generally have a hard time interacting with them in the real world so you are "willing to act" as an arrogant piece of shit proclaiming with certainty and idiotic self-assurance what the motivations are of any and all doubleplusungood nonpersons that you come across. Beyond your basement dwelling jack-off sessions playing Wikipedia, you have nothing to live for, and that causes you intense anxiety and an extreme "will to act" as a self-appointed guardian of the cult of which you're so happy to be a part. You're "willing to act" like a total schmuck because you think that your hard-fought attrition into some obscure cadre called the "Arbitration Committee" gives you a great responsibility as some Great Person on a popular internet site.

Well, you know what? You're nothing.

FUCK YOU.

If any member of the human race wants to use the perfectly legal means of fucking with Wikipedia because that website keeps more open doors and security holes in place than almost anywhere else of the world wide web, I encourage them to do so, if only to waste more of your miserable life's time so that we can ensure you'll stay locked in your basement and won't interact with the real world.


I encourage such people to slit their wrists and save us from having to listen to their pedantic emo retardation. I will also point out that most movies with wrist-slitting do it completely wrong by showing the wound going across the wrist, when in reality you need to go up and down (i.e. inner-elbow-to-wrist) to get the preferred (i.e. dead) good result.

I am no fan of Wikipedia governance, but sometimes they do get it right; Mbz's ban was in all ways, shapes and forms correct.

This is a pathetic wastrel who in another time and place would've been shipped off to the gulag without a second thought.

That's our reporter Trolli Trollerson with his "View From Under The Bridge." Thank you, Trolli, and now back to the studio . . . .
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

6 Pages V < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 7:57am