From the 2011-2012
Wikimedia Foundation plan (page 19):
QUOTE
The likeliest source of external distraction is probably media resulting from a reputational issue, such as editorial scandal or perceived organizational impropriety. Risk of editorial scandal can't be mitigated: there is an inherent level of risk that we cannot side-step. Risk of organizational impropriety is unlikely at the WMF due to its experienced leadership team and well-established controls. However, the risk is greater within the chapters, which are young and primarily run by volunteers with little experience.
So, is it
perceived organizational impropriety, or is it
actual organizational impropriety?
This post has been edited by thekohser: