You people. Sheesh.
First of all, you start off this thread by calling me a "notorious pedophile", which is if anything the exact opposite of the truth. While I found this amusing, you really shouldn't sling inflammatory accusations at people, especially when they're not true. Eric Barbour, you owe me an apology.
And a bunch of others of you should think before you talk. Your idea of "research" leaves a lot to be desired. I like
this "The admin who did the most talking was Herostratus..." Gee, I was only trying to move heaven and earth to get this (prohibition of minors posting contact info) accepted.
Of course I had the most posts. And
this. Jack-A-Roe a pedophile? Is it humanly possible to be more wrong about stuff than you people are?
In fairness, several of you did come to my defense in the cause of sanity, although it was usually a little half-hearted.
But whatever. All in good fun.
EXCEPT those fools who talked about trying to find out my real life identity. People, chill. NOT FUNNY. If you're going to lynch someone, try not to lynch the wrong people. (Hopefully, you can all see now why I do hide my identity and post little true personal information. Because of YOU.)
Anyway, FWIW, my take on the whole thing (basically a repeat of the above) is
here!, and an explanation of why I edit in this area is
here.
I wrote these basically for you, so I guess you can feel flattered and attended to, just as I felt flattered and attended to by your poring over the details of my edit histories. Gee I didn't know I was so important.
I guess there's plenty of room for cogent criticism of Wikipedia, but if you allow yourself to be led by the Eric Barbours of the world you're never going to get anywhere.
Cheers, Herostratus
P.S. You know, things have improved in this area over the years - partly thanks to tye criticisms by this site, and others. Thank you. But stop calling us names, when we now have several editors watching over this. If you see something wrong, message me (on Wikipedia) and I'll look into it.