QUOTE(GlassBeadGame @ Fri 6th August 2010, 4:11pm)
I might be giving WL too much credit but my take on them is that they are not completely in the camp of internet libertarian extremists. I base this on their pre-releasing the war dump to select mainstream outlets and holding back some material for further vetting. They seem like Indy-Media...one foot in a more socially responsible and truly progressive camp.
I would tend to agree with that analysis as well. However, something that one should remember is the relative newness of Wikileaks. They have had major leaks before 2010, but their first one to affect US military operations was about the
July 12, 2007 Baghdad airstrike (T-H-L-K-D), where they simply posted the video on a sister site and let the mainstream media start from there. I wouldn't be surprised if they are still experimenting and trying to figure out the best way to reveal secrets without doing too much damage to individuals. The next release of materials will probably be distributed in another method entirely.
QUOTE
A state document that was made available to me, which I uploaded to Wikileaks about 10 days ago, has still not been published on that site.
What was this state document? Wikileaks does have some standards for what it publishes, and your document might not have met them.
This post has been edited by NuclearWarfare: 
Wikileaks, not really a wiki?
thekohser Wikileaks 
