|
Help
This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.
Where art thou, victim of censorship? |
|
|
Tarc |
|
Fat Cat
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309
|
Perusing Wikipedia:LTA (T-H-L-K-D) today, I never realized our very own VoC, aka JoeHazelton, has an entry; QUOTE Has been stalking User:Goethean and other users since 2006 when he was involved in a conflict over the articles Peter Roskam and Tammy Duckworth. Recently, he has been nominating for deletion articles that User:Goethean created. He generally edits, from a pro-Republican viewpoint, articles relating to far west suburban Chicago politicians. He has a poor command of the English language, and speaks Polish. If his efforts are undermined, he will appear to explode with child-like, semi-coherent rage, often riddled with obscenities and with references to homosexuality, Marxism, the Chicago Outfit, Barack Obama, etc. I wish I could take credit for writing that, that is hilarious. Not sure about the Polish angle, though. This post has been edited by Tarc:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies
Tarc |
|
Fat Cat
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309
|
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 3rd September 2012, 7:53pm) QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Mon 3rd September 2012, 6:10pm) QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 3rd September 2012, 5:24pm) Mr Tarc Meridian is just a bitter little man, drunk with the power that Wiki juice gives him. If I was the operators of this board, I would ban him, because he contributes nothing but to cyber-stalk me.
http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/tarc.htmlI see that you received some aid from Mr. Brandt. Thank you my friend.... Too funny, esp to see Suarez be Brandt's errand boy across the internets. Got some bad news for you though, JoJo; as I posted over on the "Other Forum", it is fake. Danny does not want to find out what'll happen if the misidentified person there ever sees that page, though.
|
|
|
|
victim of censorship |
|
Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,166
Joined:
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640
|
QUOTE(Tarc @ Mon 3rd September 2012, 8:14pm) QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 3rd September 2012, 7:53pm) QUOTE(Michaeldsuarez @ Mon 3rd September 2012, 6:10pm) QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Mon 3rd September 2012, 5:24pm) Mr Tarc Meridian is just a bitter little man, drunk with the power that Wiki juice gives him. If I was the operators of this board, I would ban him, because he contributes nothing but to cyber-stalk me.
http://www.wikipedia-watch.org/tarc.htmlI see that you received some aid from Mr. Brandt. Thank you my friend.... Too funny, esp to see Suarez be Brandt's errand boy across the internets. Got some bad news for you though, JoJo; as I posted over on the "Other Forum", it is fake. Danny does not want to find out what'll happen if the misidentified person there ever sees that page, though. Me tool... I got bad news for you... You are registered with my local police dept as a Cyber-bully.
|
|
|
|
Tarc |
|
Fat Cat
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309
|
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Tue 4th September 2012, 1:57am) Me tool... I got bad news for you... You are registered with my local police dept as a Cyber-bully.
Again, if you're using the name on that page, you're barking up the wrong tree. Second, if you're going to lie at least do it intelligently; there's no such thing as a "cyber-bully registry", at your or anyone else's police station. Even if someday in the future such a thing comes about, I'm pretty sure there'd be this little thing called "due process" that'd be followed first. What kind of sucker would believe that anyone can just walk into a police station, hand them a bunch of computer printouts and think that puts someone on a magic list? Think, JoJo. You're not terribly creative or clever when you try to venture beyond your "jumbo juice" shtick. This post has been edited by Tarc:
|
|
|
|
victim of censorship |
|
Not all thugs are Wikipediots, but all Wikipediots are thugs.
Group: Contributors
Posts: 1,166
Joined:
From: The SOCK HOP
Member No.: 9,640
|
QUOTE(Tarc @ Tue 4th September 2012, 12:58pm) QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Tue 4th September 2012, 1:57am) Me tool... I got bad news for you... You are registered with my local police dept as a Cyber-bully.
Again, if you're using the name on that page, you're barking up the wrong tree. Second, if you're going to lie at least do it intelligently; there's no such thing as a "cyber-bully registry", at your or anyone else's police station. Even if someday in the future such a thing comes about, I'm pretty sure there'd be this little thing called "due process" that'd be followed first. What kind of sucker would believe that anyone can just walk into a police station, hand them a bunch of computer printouts and think that puts someone on a magic list? Think, JoJo. You're not terribly creative or clever when you try to venture beyond your "jumbo juice" shtick. You think so...in "El-a NOY" were I live, you may have a problem You should stay away from me now... This post has been edited by victim of censorship:
|
|
|
|
Tarc |
|
Fat Cat
Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,124
Joined:
Member No.: 5,309
|
QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Thu 6th September 2012, 2:56am) QUOTE(Tarc @ Tue 4th September 2012, 12:58pm) QUOTE(victim of censorship @ Tue 4th September 2012, 1:57am) Me tool... I got bad news for you... You are registered with my local police dept as a Cyber-bully.
Again, if you're using the name on that page, you're barking up the wrong tree. Second, if you're going to lie at least do it intelligently; there's no such thing as a "cyber-bully registry", at your or anyone else's police station. Even if someday in the future such a thing comes about, I'm pretty sure there'd be this little thing called "due process" that'd be followed first. What kind of sucker would believe that anyone can just walk into a police station, hand them a bunch of computer printouts and think that puts someone on a magic list? Think, JoJo. You're not terribly creative or clever when you try to venture beyond your "jumbo juice" shtick. You think so...in "El-a NOY" were I live, you may have a problem You should stay away from me now... So: QUOTE Cyberstalking
720 ILCS 5/12-7.5. Cyberstalking. 2001.
(a) A person commits cyberstalking when he or she, knowingly and without lawful justification, on at least 2 separate occasions, harasses another person through the use of electronic communication and:
(1) at any time transmits a threat of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint and the threat is directed towards that person or a family member of that person, or
(2) places that person or a family member of that person in reasonable apprehension of immediate or future bodily harm, sexual assault, confinement, or restraint.
(b) As used in this Section:
"Harass" means to engage in a knowing and willful course of conduct directed at a specific person that alarms, torments, or terrorizes that person.
"Electronic communication" means any transfer of signs, signals, writings, sounds, data, or intelligence of any nature transmitted in whole or in part by a wire, radio, electronmagnetic, photoelectric, or photo-optical system. "Electronic communication" includes transmissions by a computer through the Internet to another computer.
© Sentence. Cyberstalking is a Class 4 felony. A second or subsequent conviction for cyberstalking is a Class 3 felony.
My intent has never been to "alarms, torments, or terrorize". This is what I told Brandt last night; we're adults who simply do not like each other, engaged in an argument. I make no threats of bodily harm (as I believe you have done to me and to Gothean), no threats to visit your place of business or home. I have never engaged with you beyond the confines of the Wikipedia Review and the Wikipedia. We're both on an internet forum, not following each other anywhere. You have no valid claim to make of "harassment", and denigrate those who actually do. Seriously, JoJo...man up. This post has been edited by Tarc:
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| |