The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This subforum is for critical evaluation of Wikipedia articles. However, to reduce topic-bloat, please make note of exceptionally poor stubs, lists, and other less attention-worthy material in the Miscellaneous Grab Bag thread. Also, please be aware that agents of the Wikimedia Foundation might use your evaluations to improve the articles in question.

Useful Links: Featured Article CandidatesFeatured Article ReviewArticles for DeletionDeletion Review

2 Pages V  1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Rachel Marsden's wiki biography
thekohser
post Sun 18th May 2008, 3:48am
Post #1


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



It would appear that Rachel Marsden is in control of her own wiki biography.

Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Sun 18th May 2008, 4:17am
Post #2


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(thekohser @ Sat 17th May 2008, 10:48pm) *
It would appear that Rachel Marsden is in control of her own wiki biography.

Indeed! smiling.gif

And she doesn't like to use "Preview" either, does she?

One of these days I'm going to have to write up a biography about myself on that thing... I just wish I could remember something I've actually done. Or for that matter, what my name is.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Sun 18th May 2008, 4:33am
Post #3


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



By the way, don't feel like you can't link to the actual article, particularly in a case like this:

http://www.wikipediareview.com/Rachel_Marsden

I take it there's not going to be a section entitled Unwise Boyfriend-Selection Issues...?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Giggy
post Sun 18th May 2008, 5:36am
Post #4


Über Member
*****

Group: Inactive
Posts: 755
Joined: Mon 31st Mar 2008, 3:02am
From: Australia
Member No.: 5,552

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Yebbut...Jimbo can't edit this one!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sun 18th May 2008, 5:38am
Post #5


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Somey @ Sun 18th May 2008, 4:33am) *

By the way, don't feel like you can't link to the actual article, particularly in a case like this:

http://www.wikipediareview.com/Rachel_Marsden

I take it there's not going to be a section entitled Unwise Boyfriend-Selection Issues...?

At least no piped redirects to Bunny Boiler
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Sun 18th May 2008, 6:50am
Post #6


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



Ms. Marsden has really been lighting up Valleywag recently. Apparently she thinks the person calling himself "colonelpanic" in these comments is Jimbo himself. Meanwhile, she's changed her avatar image on Valleywag to a photo of former Marine drill-sergeant-turned-actor R. Lee Ermey Gen. George S. Patton:

FORUM Image


Perhaps most interestingly of all, she posted a comment with the most detailed explanation of her relationship with Der (co-)Flounder yet:
QUOTE(Rachel Marsden @ May 17 2008 12:56 AM)
Actually the events are a bit out of order. Here, as someone who obviously is far more of an authority on the events of her life than an anonymous internet "fan", let me give you a hand, dear:

1) Rachel and Jimmy start fighting over his admission, well into the relationship, that he's a practitioner of polygamy and prefers multiple sex partners.

2) Rachel admits to Jimmy that she's not sure how much longer she can take being in a relationshp with a lying, sleazy, sack of shit that will happily screw anything and everything on two legs.

3) As a power-trip, Jimmy threatens Rachel with deportation if she ever breathes a word of their relationship to the point where the rest of his floozies find out he's been cheating on them with at least one other woman (in reality, he cheats on several women simultaneously, and is admittedly proud of it). Rachel tells him to go f himself.

4) Within a day, Jimmy posts breakup notice for the world to see on Wikipedia.

5) Rachel tells him she'll be responding to media inquiries about his breakup announcement in kind - by auctioning off his reeking clothes on eBay


Ouch!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
guy
post Sun 18th May 2008, 7:15am
Post #7


Postmaster General
*********

Group: Inactive
Posts: 4,294
Joined: Mon 27th Feb 2006, 8:52pm
From: London
Member No.: 23



QUOTE(Rachel Marsden @ May 17 2008 12:56 AM)
as someone who obviously is far more of an authority on the events of her life than an anonymous internet "fan"

Original research! Conflict of interest!
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Sun 18th May 2008, 7:18am
Post #8


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Somey @ Sun 18th May 2008, 6:50am) *

Ms. Marsden has really been lighting up Valleywag recently.
Perhaps most interestingly of all, she posted a comment with the most detailed explanation of her relationship with Der (co-)Flounder yet:
QUOTE(Rachel Marsden @ May 17 2008 12:56 AM)
Actually the events are a bit out of order. Here, as someone who obviously is far more of an authority on the events of her life than an anonymous internet "fan", let me give you a hand, dear:

1) Rachel and Jimmy start fighting over his admission, well into the relationship, that he's a practitioner of polygamy and prefers multiple sex partners.

2) Rachel admits to Jimmy that she's not sure how much longer she can take being in a relationshp with a lying, sleazy, sack of shit that will happily screw anything and everything on two legs.

3) As a power-trip, Jimmy threatens Rachel with deportation if she ever breathes a word of their relationship to the point where the rest of his floozies find out he's been cheating on them with at least one other woman (in reality, he cheats on several women simultaneously, and is admittedly proud of it). Rachel tells him to go f himself.

4) Within a day, Jimmy posts breakup notice for the world to see on Wikipedia.

5) Rachel tells him she'll be responding to media inquiries about his breakup announcement in kind - by auctioning off his reeking clothes on eBay


Ouch!

Indeed. Threatening a Canadian with deportation? That really is funny.

As for the rest, Dorothy Parker summed it up: biggrin.gif

Woman wants monogamy;
Man delights in novelty.
Love is woman's moon and sun;
Man has other forms of fun.
Woman lives but in her lord;
Count to ten, and man is bored.
With this the gist and sum of it,
What earthly good can come of it?


And oh, what the heck-- so long as we're doing Parker on this subject:

Reuben's Children
Accursed from their birth they be
Who seek to find monogamy,
Pursuing it from bed to bed ---
I think they would be better dead.

Fable
Oh, there once was a lady, and so I've been told,
Whose lover grew weary, whose lover grew cold.
"My child," he remarked, "though our episode ends,
In the manner of men, I suggest we be friends."
And the truest of friends ever after they were ---
Oh, they lied in their teeth when they told me of her!


This post has been edited by Milton Roe: Sun 18th May 2008, 9:14am
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 28th May 2008, 3:23pm
Post #9


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



Somebody (not me!) has been busy reserving domain names:

www.wikipediarachelmarsden.com

www.wikipediarachelmarsden.org

They re-direct to a site that I own, so if you are opposed to promoting traffic on a site that I own, do not click these links.

Greg
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Wed 28th May 2008, 3:36pm
Post #10


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,736
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 28th May 2008, 11:23am) *

Somebody (not me!) has been busy reserving domain names:

www.wikipediarachelmarsden.com

www.wikipediarachelmarsden.org

They re-direct to a site that I own, so if you are opposed to promoting traffic on a site that I own, do not click these links.

Greg


No, I didn't click them, and then, just to be xtra mean, I went back and didn't click them 3 times more.

Jon cool.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Emperor
post Wed 28th May 2008, 3:43pm
Post #11


Try spam today!
*******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,833
Joined: Sat 21st Jul 2007, 4:09pm
Member No.: 2,042



Are there any plans to help her with some of those red links? Also, I clicked Canada (a blue link) and found this.

(edited to amend link to version at time I posted)

This post has been edited by Emperor: Wed 28th May 2008, 8:27pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Wed 28th May 2008, 4:42pm
Post #12


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,736
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Emperor @ Wed 28th May 2008, 11:43am) *

Are there any plans to help her with some of those red links? Also, I clicked Canada (a blue link) and found this.


It's not what BillyBoy meant by "undiscovered country", but there are many who've yet to discover it.

Jon cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jon Awbrey: Wed 28th May 2008, 4:56pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
thekohser
post Wed 28th May 2008, 4:53pm
Post #13


Member
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,274
Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm
Member No.: 911



QUOTE(Emperor @ Wed 28th May 2008, 11:43am) *

Are there any plans to help her with some of those red links? Also, I clicked Canada (a blue link) and found this.

I made a feeble attempt to upgrade that page a bit. Please stop linking from here to my site, though. It bothers many members of this forum.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Milton Roe
post Wed 28th May 2008, 5:06pm
Post #14


Known alias of J. Random Troll
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 10,209
Joined: Thu 28th Feb 2008, 1:03am
Member No.: 5,156

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Jon Awbrey @ Wed 28th May 2008, 4:42pm) *

QUOTE(Emperor @ Wed 28th May 2008, 11:43am) *

Are there any plans to help her with some of those red links? Also, I clicked Canada (a blue link) and found this.


It's not what BillyBoy meant by "undiscovered country", but there are many who've yet to discover it.

Jon cool.gif

Ah, but there are many travelers who return from Canada; not as many who make it back out of California. Pity those who spend their Januaries and Februaries in hot tubs under the palms in their back yards.

-- The Bourn Identity
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Wed 28th May 2008, 5:16pm
Post #15


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,736
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 28th May 2008, 12:53pm) *

QUOTE(Emperor @ Wed 28th May 2008, 11:43am) *

Are there any plans to help her with some of those red links? Also, I clicked Canada (a blue link) and found this.


I made a feeble attempt to upgrade that page a bit. Please stop linking from here to my site, though. It bothers many members of this forum.


QUOTE

BAD BIZ !!! BAD BIZ !!!

Whatcha Gonna Do !?

Whatcha Gonna Do

When They Click On U !?


Jon cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jon Awbrey: Wed 28th May 2008, 5:18pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Somey
post Wed 28th May 2008, 5:36pm
Post #16


Can't actually moderate
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 11,814
Joined: Sat 17th Jun 2006, 7:47pm
From: Dreamland
Member No.: 275



QUOTE(thekohser @ Wed 28th May 2008, 11:53am) *
I made a feeble attempt to upgrade that page a bit.

Personally, I thought the original version had more... "panache." Besides, what more really needs to be said? It's Canada, for Pete's sake.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LaraLove
post Wed 28th May 2008, 7:59pm
Post #17


Wikipedia BLP advocate
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,741
Joined: Mon 28th Jan 2008, 7:53pm
Member No.: 4,627

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE
Rachel Marsden at 04:44 PM on 05/12/08

@Durova: Oh wow, how original of you to say you Wikipidiotic cultist twat. And I'm sure in Wikipidiotville, Jimmy's considered a real catch. Go impale yourself on a Barnstar.

ohmy.gif laugh.gif
Hahahaha, I love this bitch.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kato
post Wed 28th May 2008, 8:07pm
Post #18


dhd
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 5,521
Joined: Fri 29th Dec 2006, 8:39pm
Member No.: 767



QUOTE(LaraHate @ Wed 28th May 2008, 8:59pm) *

QUOTE
Rachel Marsden at 04:44 PM on 05/12/08

@Durova: Oh wow, how original of you to say you Wikipidiotic cultist twat. And I'm sure in Wikipidiotville, Jimmy's considered a real catch. Go impale yourself on a Barnstar.

ohmy.gif laugh.gif
Hahahaha, I love this bitch.

Yeah, you can't really beat that! laugh.gif

I recommend checking those Valleywag comment sections on their Wikipedia related articles, because Marsden has set herself up in residence. And she's hilarious.

Those Wikipediots who moan about Wikipedia Review should note when reading all the users' comments on Valleywag, and similar forums, how vitriolic they are. If one considers them, and all the lunatic crap and nasty vandalism that goes on at Wikipedia, in comparison, Wikipedia Review is a shining light of civil, intellectual discourse and beats the lot of them hands down.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
LaraLove
post Wed 28th May 2008, 8:15pm
Post #19


Wikipedia BLP advocate
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,741
Joined: Mon 28th Jan 2008, 7:53pm
Member No.: 4,627

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 28th May 2008, 4:07pm) *

Those Wikipediots who moan about Wikipedia Review should note when reading all the users' comments on Valleywag, and similar forums, how vitriolic they are. If one considers them, and all the lunatic crap and nasty vandalism that goes on at Wikipedia, in comparison, Wikipedia Review is a shining light of civil, intellectual discourse and beats the lot of them hands down.

Having actually gotten involved here, WR is not nearly what it's depicted as on WP. Not even close. There's a proportionally equal amount of mudslinging, but here it's coupled with the overuse of smilies, which makes insults less insulting, right? Or just more annoying... either way, at least here there's not the use of "straw man" and "WP:CIVIL" in every other post. And more often than not, the bitching here is legitimate and backed by evidence, which is not something that can be said about the vast majority of bullshit claims made on the discussion pages of WP.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Moulton
post Wed 28th May 2008, 8:50pm
Post #20


Anthropologist from Mars
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 10,220
Joined: Mon 29th Oct 2007, 9:56pm
From: Greater Boston
Member No.: 3,670

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Kato @ Wed 28th May 2008, 4:07pm) *
QUOTE(LaraHate @ Wed 28th May 2008, 8:59pm) *
ohmy.gif laugh.gif
Hahahaha, I love this bitch.
Yeah, you can't really beat that! laugh.gif

I dunno if this beats Rachel Marsden's charming Op-Ed copy, but it's definitely in the running...

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V  1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 18th 5 13, 4:28pm