The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> Help

This forum is for discussing specific Wikipedia editors, editing patterns, and general efforts by those editors to influence or direct content in ways that might not be in keeping with Wikipedia policy. Please source your claims and provide links where appropriate. For a glossary of terms frequently used when discussing Wikipedia and related projects, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary.

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Another expert gripes
papaya
post Wed 16th May 2007, 7:42pm
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 252
Joined: Mon 9th Apr 2007, 12:59pm
Member No.: 1,255



This time it's Pproctor, who has credentials out the wazoo, talking about being wikistalked by an admin who got a bee in his bonnet about Pp citing his own unquestionably citable papers. The money 'graf:
QUOTE
Meanwhile, members of his "clique" are sending public messages to each other proposing to look very closely at my postings. Apparently, to send a message. True, there is no "wikipedia cabal". But there are groups of people who cooperate in faking a "consensus"-- against the rules, naturally. The lesson is that you post on controversial subjects at your peril.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jonny Cache
post Wed 16th May 2007, 8:24pm
Post #2


τα δε μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 5,100
Joined: Sat 9th Sep 2006, 1:52am
Member No.: 398

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(papaya @ Wed 16th May 2007, 3:42pm) *

This time it's Pproctor, who has credentials out the wazoo, talking about being wikistalked by an admin who got a bee in his bonnet about Pp citing his own unquestionably citable papers. The money 'graf:

QUOTE

Meanwhile, members of his "clique" are sending public messages to each other proposing to look very closely at my postings. Apparently, to send a message. True, there is no "wikipedia cabal". But there are groups of people who cooperate in faking a "consensus" — against the rules, naturally. The lesson is that you post on controversial subjects at your peril.



Yes, I know Peter H. Proctor from the NOR Wars of Thermidor 2006, as he was one of the braver souls who stood on the ramparts against SlimViper and her Generation of Degenerates in that time. I'm surprised that he's escaped the guillotine as long as he has.

Of course, it's only a matter of time ...

Jonny cool.gif

This post has been edited by Jonny Cache: Wed 16th May 2007, 8:25pm
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Unrepentant Vandal
post Thu 17th May 2007, 5:30pm
Post #3


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed 6th Sep 2006, 12:38pm
Member No.: 394



QUOTE(Jonny Cache @ Wed 16th May 2007, 9:24pm) *

QUOTE(papaya @ Wed 16th May 2007, 3:42pm) *

This time it's Pproctor, who has credentials out the wazoo, talking about being wikistalked by an admin who got a bee in his bonnet about Pp citing his own unquestionably citable papers. The money 'graf:

QUOTE

Meanwhile, members of his "clique" are sending public messages to each other proposing to look very closely at my postings. Apparently, to send a message. True, there is no "wikipedia cabal". But there are groups of people who cooperate in faking a "consensus" — against the rules, naturally. The lesson is that you post on controversial subjects at your peril.



Yes, I know Peter H. Proctor from the NOR Wars of Thermidor 2006, as he was one of the braver souls who stood on the ramparts against SlimViper and her Generation of Degenerates in that time. I'm surprised that he's escaped the guillotine as long as he has.

Of course, it's only a matter of time ...

Jonny cool.gif


Shall we start a pool?

It's just as possible, of course, that he'll give up.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 25th 5 13, 4:00am