QUOTE(Daniel Brandt @ Sun 18th May 2008, 8:48pm)
QUOTE(msharma @ Sun 18th May 2008, 2:30pm)
May I say I contrast your concern for this person's feelings and livelihood as a (probably) bent literary agent with what you demonstrate towards certain others and come to further conclusions about the morality and consistency of your campaign.
What are you suggesting? That I'm opposed to anonymous editors on Wikipedia, and that I'm inclined to sympathize with non-Wikipedians, such as John Seigenthaler, who find themselves victimized by biographies on Wikipedia?
Gasp! I had no idea!
No, that you operate on only that principle, and in a moral vacuum otherwise. Sad, actually.
Not to mention your assumption that all bios are victimization. Really, some bios are warnings. Of course, to recognise that you'd have to be operating in a moral non-vacuum.