The Wikipedia Review: A forum for discussion and criticism of Wikipedia
Wikipedia Review Op-Ed Pages

Welcome, Guest! ( Log In | Register )

> General Discussion? What's that all about?

This subforum is for general discussion of Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects. For a glossary of terms frequently used in such discussions, please refer to Wikipedia:Glossary. For a glossary of musical terms, see here. Other useful links:

Akahele.orgWikipedia-WatchWikitruthWP:ANWikiEN-L/Foundation-L (mailing lists) • Citizendium forums

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> You're Either With Wiki Or Against It..., Now in Essay Form! For Easy Swallowing!
jd turk
post Tue 11th May 2010, 1:28am
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon 5th May 2008, 12:56am
Member No.: 5,976



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:You...s_or_against_us


User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
NuclearWarfare
post Tue 11th May 2010, 1:37am
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Contributors
Posts: 382
Joined: Tue 23rd Dec 2008, 10:24pm
Member No.: 9,506

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



It looks like a (pretty boring, actually) humor page. What's special about it?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jd turk
post Tue 11th May 2010, 1:40am
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Contributors
Posts: 183
Joined: Mon 5th May 2008, 12:56am
Member No.: 5,976



QUOTE(NuclearWarfare @ Mon 10th May 2010, 8:37pm) *

It looks like a (pretty boring, actually) humor page. What's special about it?


It's already been changed several times, although not by the original author. Here's the original text.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=361333482

It doesn't seem to be intended to be humorous, and seems directly aimed at Larry Sanger (or anyone else who is "against" Wikipedia in vague, unspecified terms).
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Kelly Martin
post Tue 11th May 2010, 2:32am
Post #4


Bring back the guttersnipes!
********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 3,270
Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am
From: EN61bw
Member No.: 6,696



Sadly, the page in question does not appear to have been offered as humor.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Ottava
post Tue 11th May 2010, 2:43am
Post #5


Über Pokemon
********

Group: Contributors
Posts: 2,916
Joined: Thu 31st Jul 2008, 6:35pm
Member No.: 7,328

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



If it was true, why are so many of the Arbitrators not banned? I mean, there is tons of evidence after all. smile.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Tue 11th May 2010, 4:40am
Post #6


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,745
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



What a maroon!

Jon tongue.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Zoloft
post Tue 11th May 2010, 6:35am
Post #7


May we all find solace in our dreams.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,332
Joined: Fri 15th Jan 2010, 11:08pm
From: Erewhon
Member No.: 16,621



O con noi o contro di noi
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Peter Damian
post Tue 11th May 2010, 10:51am
Post #8


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,400
Joined: Tue 18th Dec 2007, 9:25pm
Member No.: 4,212

WP user page - talk
check - contribs




QUOTE
As a general principle, I think the time has come when we tighten up on vandalism and those who are not generally supportive of our founding principles. It appears that our greatest strength has now become our greatest weakness. We are already too tolerant of the former, leaving it to four warnings before blocking, even temporarily, except in obvious and gross circumstances. As regards the latter, I know of no other website that tolerates abuse of its basic principles for one moment, and that includes Facebook and MySpace. This endeavour, to my mind, is a generous, and some would say liberal, attempt to provide free knowledge written by altruistic volunteers. Maybe that essay is too short and not fully-argued, but it's an opening in a debate; and it's currently an opinion. Rodhullandemu 01:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=361387412
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tarc
post Tue 11th May 2010, 1:08pm
Post #9


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 976
Joined: Fri 7th Mar 2008, 3:38am
Member No.: 5,309

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Tue 11th May 2010, 6:51am) *

QUOTE
As a general principle, I think the time has come when we tighten up on vandalism and those who are not generally supportive of our founding principles. It appears that our greatest strength has now become our greatest weakness. We are already too tolerant of the former, leaving it to four warnings before blocking, even temporarily, except in obvious and gross circumstances. As regards the latter, I know of no other website that tolerates abuse of its basic principles for one moment, and that includes Facebook and MySpace. This endeavour, to my mind, is a generous, and some would say liberal, attempt to provide free knowledge written by altruistic volunteers. Maybe that essay is too short and not fully-argued, but it's an opening in a debate; and it's currently an opinion. Rodhullandemu 01:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=361387412



Man, who does Rod think he is here, Dick Cheney? That is one ignorant mindset there.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
dogbiscuit
post Tue 11th May 2010, 1:13pm
Post #10


Could you run through Verifiability not Truth once more?
********

Group: Members
Posts: 2,972
Joined: Tue 4th Dec 2007, 12:42am
From: The Midlands
Member No.: 4,015



QUOTE(Tarc @ Tue 11th May 2010, 2:08pm) *

QUOTE(Peter Damian @ Tue 11th May 2010, 6:51am) *

QUOTE
As a general principle, I think the time has come when we tighten up on vandalism and those who are not generally supportive of our founding principles. It appears that our greatest strength has now become our greatest weakness. We are already too tolerant of the former, leaving it to four warnings before blocking, even temporarily, except in obvious and gross circumstances. As regards the latter, I know of no other website that tolerates abuse of its basic principles for one moment, and that includes Facebook and MySpace. This endeavour, to my mind, is a generous, and some would say liberal, attempt to provide free knowledge written by altruistic volunteers. Maybe that essay is too short and not fully-argued, but it's an opening in a debate; and it's currently an opinion. Rodhullandemu 01:12, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=...oldid=361387412



Man, who does Rod think he is here, Dick Cheney? That is one ignorant mindset there.

Not within the portals of WikiWorld - they really believe this stuff.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Jon Awbrey
post Tue 11th May 2010, 1:16pm
Post #11


τὰ δέ μοι παθήματα μαθήματα γέγονε
*********

Group: Moderators
Posts: 6,745
Joined: Sun 6th Apr 2008, 4:52am
From: Meat Puppet Nation
Member No.: 5,619

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



QUOTE(Tarc @ Tue 11th May 2010, 9:08am) *

Man, who does Rod think he is here, Dick Cheney?


Well, if he does, then he's half right.

Cf. Adminions Who Have Themselves Confused With Robots

Jon dry.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Tarc
post Tue 11th May 2010, 7:07pm
Post #12


Über Member
*****

Group: Regulars
Posts: 976
Joined: Fri 7th Mar 2008, 3:38am
Member No.: 5,309

WP user page - talk
check - contribs



Wikipedia:What A Maroon! (T-H-L-K-D)

Well played.

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
A Horse With No Name
post Tue 11th May 2010, 8:10pm
Post #13


I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin!
*********

Group: Regulars
Posts: 4,471
Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm
Member No.: 9,985



QUOTE(Ottava @ Mon 10th May 2010, 10:43pm) *

If it was true, why are so many of the Arbitrators not banned? I mean, there is tons of evidence after all. smile.gif


Tons? Oh, please - Foz and Brad aren't that fat! ermm.gif

QUOTE(Kelly Martin @ Mon 10th May 2010, 10:32pm) *

Sadly, the page in question does not appear to have been offered as humor.


It ain't funny, in any of its versions. hrmph.gif
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Zoloft
post Tue 11th May 2010, 10:23pm
Post #14


May we all find solace in our dreams.
******

Group: Regulars
Posts: 1,332
Joined: Fri 15th Jan 2010, 11:08pm
From: Erewhon
Member No.: 16,621



Although it does link to Sneetches, with stars above their breeches...
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

-   Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 19th 6 13, 5:17pm