QUOTE(Selina @ Sun 29th January 2012, 6:48pm)
Nothing wrong with bondage between consenting adults though. But putting pictures up of naked little boys is the glorification of paedophilia and children cannot CONSENT to having photographs taken of them like that... It's an old photo but that doesn't mean it's still not abuse that some creep got that child to hold up that fish and say "make the fish suck on it"...
I think a lot of the reason there isn't a backlash to is actually because it's a male child and
the users are mostly male, it's less shocking to them - but if he was parading around a picture of a naked little girl instead I bet there wouldn't be such apparent apathy
I'm not sure the background you are giving to that image is altogether correct. I also don't think the lad is as young as his face would imply. His well-hung anatomy and scrotum size would point to him being 15 or 16 give or take. And in those days, and at that age he would have been no innocent.
In any case it's a nice picture that I see as non-sexual in tone. No more so than a Titan nude anyway,
QUOTE(Vigilant @ Sun 29th January 2012, 7:02pm)
Ultimately, it's about the lulz... (IMG:
smilys0b23ax56/default/wink.gif)
I save them for Ottava and Kohs.