|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() ![]() |
| JohnA |
Mon 9th May 2011, 12:10pm
Post
#1
|
|
Looking over Winston Smith's shoulder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,171 Joined: Sun 30th Jul 2006, 9:56pm Member No.: 313 |
|
| carbuncle |
Mon 9th May 2011, 12:40pm
Post
#2
|
![]() Fat Cat ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,601 Joined: Sun 30th Mar 2008, 4:48pm Member No.: 5,544 |
Who you gonna believe - WP or your lying eyes?
|
| thekohser |
Mon 9th May 2011, 1:27pm
Post
#3
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 10,274 Joined: Thu 1st Feb 2007, 10:21pm Member No.: 911 |
Obviously, when the church heard that the Google satellite would be flying overhead, they hired this guy to chalk their roofless church floor, so that it looks like it has a roof. For insurance purposes, of course.
|
| Michaeldsuarez |
Mon 9th May 2011, 1:50pm
Post
#4
|
![]() Über Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 553 Joined: Mon 9th Aug 2010, 7:51pm From: New York, New York Member No.: 24,428 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
http://www.visitchurches.org.uk/AboutCCTou...s/2000Hartwell/
They decided to re-roof the church in 2000. Edit: Credit for finding the source goes to the anon on Talk:St_Mary's_Church,_Hartwell. This post has been edited by Michaeldsuarez: Mon 9th May 2011, 1:52pm |
| lilburne |
Mon 9th May 2011, 3:35pm
Post
#5
|
![]() Chameleon ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Contributors Posts: 890 Joined: Thu 17th Jun 2010, 11:42am Member No.: 21,803 WP user page - talk check - contribs |
Away with you all: Wikipedia is NOTTRUTH.
|
| Kelly Martin |
Mon 9th May 2011, 5:50pm
Post
#6
|
|
Bring back the guttersnipes! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 3,270 Joined: Sun 22nd Jun 2008, 4:41am From: EN61bw Member No.: 6,696 |
Using Google Earth to determine that the church does, in fact, have a roof is prohibited original research. If sources say the church has no roof, then it has no roof, and any evidence to the contrary that hasn't been published on the Internet must simply be disregarded as unreliable.
|
| A Horse With No Name |
Mon 9th May 2011, 5:58pm
Post
#7
|
![]() I have as much free time as a Wikipedia admin! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 4,471 Joined: Mon 26th Jan 2009, 1:54pm Member No.: 9,985 |
They should really change the name of that category from "Did You Know?" to "Do You Really Care?"
![]() |
| Cock-up-over-conspiracy |
Mon 9th May 2011, 8:19pm
Post
#8
|
![]() Now censored by flckr.com and who else ... ??? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Regulars Posts: 1,693 Joined: Sat 6th Dec 2008, 6:08am Member No.: 9,267 |
Using Google Earth to determine that the church does, in fact, have a roof is prohibited original research. That is a strange one I came up against recently, "It is not proof enough to read a picture, you have to read someone else saying what is in the picture." Why aren't pictures reliable sources? "If a picture paints a thousands words ...", sung by Vin Diesel's father ... |
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th 5 13, 7:13pm |